Thursday, October 25, 2007

Kucinich questions Bush's stability, weighs new impeachment effort of both Cheney & Bush

Kucinich questions Bush's stability, weighs new impeachment effort

Posted by Sabrina Eaton October 24, 2007 11:51AM

http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2007/10/kucinich_questions_bushs_stabi.html

At a presidential campaign appearance last Sunday in California, Cleveland Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich said he's considering introducing a new impeachment resolution against President Bush in light of statements the president has made that Kucinich interprets as a prelude to war with Iran.

"This is not a funny thing I am about to say, and I want you to just be with me on it," Kucinich told an audience in Sierra Madre. "It's not funny at all. There's questions about his stability. Because, if he begins to talk openly about World War Three, I don't think anyone in their right mind would want to talk about that. Because we're talking about a nuclear war."

Kucinich's comments were recorded on this video, posted on YouTube. His impeachment remarks are in its final half.

Kucinich introduced a measure to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney in April. That effort has 21 cosponsors, but has not gone anywhere because House Democratic leaders insist impeachment is "off the table." Kucinich suggested impeaching Cheney first to avoid a Cheney presidency if Bush leaves office.

"I actually am going to be talking to the Speaker about this," Kucinich told the California audience. "I tried to reach her and missed connections. I don't think that Congress can any longer say that impeachment is off the table."

Kucinich has also discussed forcing a House floor vote on the Cheney impeachment measure through the use of a privileged resolution.

"I am seriously thinking about calling a privileged resolution on the impeachment of the vice president and forcing a vote on the floor of the House," Kucinich told radio host Ed Schultz last month. "People have to to stand up and say whether they believe in our Constitution anymore, or whether we are going along with an administration that defies the principles that founded this country."

Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
- Health
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Juan Cole: The Collapse of Bush’s Foreign Policy

Like a drunken millionaire gambling away a fortune at a Las Vegas casino, the Bush administration squandered all the assets it began with by invading Iraq and unleashing chaos in the Gulf.

The thunder of the bomb in Karachi and the Turkish shells in Iraqi Kurdistan may well be the sound of Bush losing his "war on terror."
+++

The Collapse of Bush's Foreign Policy
From Turkey to Iraq to Pakistan, the mounting chaos proves the White House is just winging it.

by Juan Cole

The Bush administration once imagined that its presence in Afghanistan and Iraq would be anchored by friendly neighbors, Turkey to the west and Pakistan to the east. Last week, as the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan continued to deteriorate, the anchors themselves also came loose.

On Sunday, just days after the Turkish Parliament authorized an invasion of Iraqi Kurdistan, Kurdish guerrillas ambushed and killed 17 Turkish soldiers inside Turkey. In Karachi, Pakistan, a massive bomb nearly killed U.S.-backed Benazir Bhutto, who was supposed to help stabilize the country. The Bush administration's entire Middle East policy is coming undone — if it even has a policy left, other than just sticking its fingers in the multiple, and multiplying, holes in the dike.

In Iraq, the Kurds of the north are the United States' most reliable allies. In addition to the 5.5 million Kurds in Iraq, however, persons speaking dialects of Kurdish constitute around 11 million of neighboring Turkey's 70 million citizens. There are another 4 million Kurds next door in Iran, and up to 2 million in Syria. All three of Iraq's northern neighbors fear that Kurdish nationalism, which has been fostered by the U.S. occupation of Iraq, could tear them apart. Opposition to that nationalism could provide a platform for an alliance of Syria, Turkey and Iran — a nightmare for the Bush administration. Washington had hoped to isolate Syria, an ally of both Iran and of Hezbollah in Lebanon. That's not how it is turning out.

Even after Turkey declined to sign on to the Iraq war, then U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz praised it in April 2003 as a dependable ally and secularizing model for the Muslim world. Since then, however, Washington's relationship with Ankara has turned increasingly sour over U.S. favoritism toward the Kurds.

The Turkish Parliament late last week passed a resolution permitting the military to make incursions into Iraq in order to chase down guerrillas operating on both sides of the border. Syria's Bashar al-Assad piled on, appearing to support the Turkish move, though under pressure from Baghdad he denied he had urged an invasion. Iran also fears Kurdish terrorism and has shelled Kurdish villages in Iraq in reprisal for guerrilla attacks in Iranian Kurdistan. Perhaps as a quid pro quo for Syrian support against the Kurds, Turkey offered this weekend to broker an agreement between Syria and Lebanon. Bush's partiality to the Kurds has provided Damascus an opening for newly warm relations with Ankara.

On Sunday, guerrillas of the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) ambushed a Turkish military convoy, killing 17 soldiers. The Turkish military counterattacked, killing 32 persons it said were guerrillas. In Istanbul on Sunday, a thousand demonstrators came out to denounce the PKK. In the two weeks prior to Sunday, the PKK had killed 28 Turkish soldiers. The mustachioed president of Turkey, Abdullah Gul, a member of the Islamist-leaning AK Party, vowed that his country would "pay any price" to protect itself. The new tensions have roiled the world petroleum markets, hurt the Turkish economy, and further destabilized an already violent Iraq.

The Iraqi leadership, already presiding over a failed state, agonized at being caught in the crossfire. The Iraqi president, the avuncular Kurd Jalal Talabani, hypocritically condemned al-Assad for urging a foreign military invasion of an Arab country, even though he himself had supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Massoud Barzani, the pudgy turbaned leader of the Kurdistan Regional Authority, warned that his government would defend its citizens and not sit idly by if Turkish troops rolled through Kurdish cities in Iraq. On Sunday, the Iraqi Parliament, having been unable to agree on virtually any internal issue or enact any benchmark legislation, promptly passed a resolution condemning the Turkish Parliament.

The ratcheting up of tensions between Turkey and the Kurdistan Regional Authority threatens to throw the last relatively quiet and prosperous corner of Iraq into turmoil. The turmoil is likely only beginning. The Iraqi Kurds are seeking to incorporate the oil-rich province of Kirkuk into their confederacy, and there is strong popular support for seceding from Iraq altogether. Turkish officials have repeatedly said that either move would set off a Turkish invasion.

As usual, the Bush administration has reacted to these predictable problems in a purely ad hoc manner. There is no evidence that anyone in the administration has crafted a policy for dealing with tensions between Ankara and America's Kurdish allies. The U.S. State Department has designated the PKK a terrorist group, but the PKK is given safe harbor by the Kurdistan Regional Authority of northern Iraq. What will Bush do about having wound up as the de facto protector of a radical peasant guerrilla group that is attacking the troops of a NATO ally? If the United States acts against the PKK, it risks alienating the Iraqi Kurds, whose pro-American peshmerga fighters perform security duties and enlist as troops in the new Iraqi army. If Bush does not restrain the PKK, then he is playing Mullah Omar to its al-Qaida and "harboring" terrorists, which he trumpeted six years ago as grounds for war.

Meanwhile, to the east, another supposed bulwark against terror is wobbling. The Bush administration had lovingly brokered the deal whereby Bhutto was allowed to return to Pakistan by military dictator Pervez Musharraf. Musharraf lacks grassroots support and has been shaken by powerful challenges from the country's supreme court, by his brutal crackdown on Muslim militants at the Red Mosque last summer, and by his continued inability to subdue the tribal forces and al-Qaida remnants in Waziristan and other rugged provinces along the Afghan border.

Washington therefore became convinced that Bhutto, who heads the popular Pakistan People's Party, might be able to come back as prime minister and cohabit with Musharraf, who was recently elected president by the Parliament and who has pledged to take off his uniform and rule as a civilian. Bhutto was elected prime minister twice, serving from 1988 to 1990 and 1993 to 1996, but both stints ended amid charges of corruption. She had lived in exile since 1999, when a military coup brought Musharraf to power. There are open cases against her in both Pakistan and Switzerland, and Interpol put her on an international wanted list in 2006 at the Musharraf regime's prompting. Washington persuaded Islamabad to drop the charges against her so that she could return.

The huge explosion that greeted Bhutto in her home turf of Karachi, however, suggests that her arrival is hardly the remedy for Pakistan's instability. Bush administration officials were dismayed when some in Bhutto's circle, such as still-exiled husband Asif Ali Zardari, initially accused the Musharraf government of being implicated in the bombing. The prospect of peace between the Bhutto camp and Musharraf's authoritarian military has been put into question.

Bhutto herself was quick to fix the blame on al-Qaida and militants in the tribal areas of the north. More dispassionate observers, such as Afghanistan expert Barnett Rubin, have also suggested that the Karachi bombing may well have been planned by militants in northern Pakistan, where the remnants of al-Qaida are thought to be hiding out. Those areas are ethnically and politically linked to southern Afghanistan, which has seen a resurgence of guerrilla violence.

And in Afghanistan itself, the situation is in a similar downward spiral. More than 5,000 Afghans have been killed in political violence so far this year, 600 of them members of the police. The United States and its NATO allies in Afghanistan allege that a revived Taliban has taken the city of Musa Qala in Helmand province. This weekend, major gun battles in that vicinity left 50 guerrillas dead. Farther to the east in Kunar province, Afghan and NATO troops engaged Pushtun guerrillas, killing 20, with one civilian dead and six wounded. Just last Thursday, a Taliban ambush near Kandahar wounded 6 NATO soldiers.

The U.S. and NATO military commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Dan McNeill, has said that between 40 and 60 percent of the Pushtun guerrilla movement is funded by opium poppies, the source of most of Western Europe's heroin. The dilemma for the Americans and NATO is that eradicating the lucrative poppy crops in southern Pushtun provinces such as Helmand appears to be driving more villagers into the ranks of the revived Taliban. Afghanistan has only some 30,000 poorly trained troops, less than half the 70,000 that NATO had planned on by this point, and the government of Hamid Karzai shows little prospect of being able to stand against insurgents for years to come.

Along with the failed state in Iraq, which has neglected to use any decrease in violence temporarily provided by the recent U.S. troop escalation to effect political reconciliation, the deteriorating situation in Afghanistan raises the specter of a collapse of both of Bush's major state-building projects. The turmoil in Turkey and Pakistan damages U.S. relations with two allies that are key to shoring up the countries under American occupation.

After Sept. 11, when the Bush administration launched its global "war on terror," the United States enjoyed some clear assets in fighting the al-Qaida terrorist network. In the Middle East, the United States had the support of secular Turkey, a NATO member. The long relationship of the powerful Pakistani military with that of the United States enabled Bush to turn the military dictator Musharraf against the Taliban, which Pakistan had earlier sponsored. Shiite Iran announced that it would provide help to the United States in its war on the hyper-Sunni Taliban regime. Baathist Syria and Iraq, secular Arab nationalist regimes, were potential bulwarks against Sunni radicalism in the Levant.

Like a drunken millionaire gambling away a fortune at a Las Vegas casino, the Bush administration squandered all the assets it began with by invading Iraq and unleashing chaos in the Gulf. The secular Baath Party in Iraq was replaced by Shiite fundamentalists, Sunni Salafi fundamentalists and Kurdish separatists. The pressure the Bush administration put on the Pakistani military government to combat Muslim militants in that country weakened the legitimacy of Musharraf, whom the Pakistani public increasingly viewed as an oppressive American puppet. Iraqi Kurdistan's willingness to give safe haven to the PKK alienated Turkey from both the new Iraqi government and its American patrons. Search-and-destroy missions in Afghanistan have predictably turned increasing numbers of Pushtun villagers against the United States, NATO and Karzai. The thunder of the bomb in Karachi and the Turkish shells in Iraqi Kurdistan may well be the sound of Bush losing his "war on terror."

Juan Cole teaches Middle Eastern and South Asian history at the University of Michigan. His most recent book Napoleon's Egypt: Invading the Middle East (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007) has just been published. He has appeared widely on television, radio and on op-ed pages as a commentator on Middle East affairs, and has a regular column at Salon.com. He has written, edited, or translated 14 books and has authored 60 journal articles. His weblog on the contemporary Middle East is Informed Comment.



Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
- Health
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World

Fitrakis, Wasserman: Will the GOP Election Theft Machine Do It Again in 2008?

  Go to Original

    Will the GOP Election Theft Machine Do It Again in 2008?
    By Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
    The Free Press

    Friday 19 October 2007

    With record low approval ratings for the Bush/Cheney regime and the albatross of an unpopular war hanging from the GOP's neck, do you think that a Democratic presidential candidate will win the White House, get us out of Iraq, and end our long national nightmare?

    Think again - the mighty election theft machine Karl Rove used to steal the US presidency in 2000 and 2004 may be under attack, but it is still in place for the upcoming 2008 election.

    With his usual devious mastery, Rove has seized upon the national outrage sparked by his electoral larceny and used it as smokescreen while he makes the American electoral system even MORE unfair, and even EASIER to rig. Thus the administration has fired federal attorneys when they would not participate in a nationwide campaign to deny minorities and the poor their access to the polls. It has spent millions of taxpayer dollars to install electronic voting machines that can be "flipped" with a few keystrokes. And under the guise of "reforming" our busted electoral system, it is setting us up for another presidential theft in 2008.

    Thus it should come as no surprise that our exclusive investigations into the firings of eight federal prosecutors who refused to execute Rove’s plans for massive disenfranchisement of Democratic voters reveal a pattern of illegalities and fraud aimed at reducing the number of minority, poor and young voters at the core of Democratic support. In the wake of major news breaks, two felony convictions have come from the rigging of the illegal Ohio 2004 vote count and recount that gave George W. Bush a second illegitimate term.

Stunning new admissions from county election boards that illegally destroyed voter records will almost certainly lead to new convictions. And the multi-million-dollar electronic voting machine scam that made possible the biggest electoral frauds in US history is under massive new attack, with key states moving to scrap the machines altogether in a desperate attempt to restore American democracy - but with the job far from done.

    Rove, Ney and the Undead

    Indeed, the Rovian theft engine is far from dead. The media groundwork has already been laid out for the Republicans to claim that hordes of illegal aliens have registered to vote. The Bush administration has been caught ordering public agencies - possibly in violation of the law - to cease registering voters. In an April 2006 speech to the Republican National Lawyers Association, Rove openly alluded to the strategy of demanding photo ID and purging voter roles of poor, minority voters just as had been done in 2000 and 2004. And, as always with Bush/Rove, there is much more beneath the surface.

    All that has happened to challenge the GOP death grip on the American vote count has been reported in the pages of Hustler and on the Internet at freepress.org, bradblog and elsewhere, and is being seized upon by a national grassroots movement determined to restore American democracy next year.

    Nowhere has that movement been more in evidence than with the high profile firestorm surrounding Bush administration Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ firing of eight federal prosecutors without legitimate cause.

    Evidence continues to surface from throughout the United States about this blatant Bush abuse of executive power. But we have traced the roots of the firings to an obscure congressional hearing held at the statehouse in Columbus, Ohio, on March 21, 2005, and to a shadowy GOP operative named Mark F. "Thor" Hearne.

    The hearing was conducted by none other than former US Rep. Bob Ney (R-18th OH). The once-powerful Ohio congressman (who is now behind bars) was the godfather of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), the national boondoggle that mandated electronic voting machines for the American electoral process.

    That the machines would cost taxpayers billions was a big plus for Ney. They would come from Diebold and other companies that poured money into Republican coffers. Thanks largely to the manipulations of disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, these e-voting machine companies would help guarantee the GOP’s ability to steal elections.

    Ney’s hearing featured a marquee appearance by J. Kenneth Blackwell, the Ohio secretary of state responsible for delivering Ohio’s decisive 2004 electoral votes to Bush. Blackwell was a key operative for the Bush election campaign in Florida in 2000 and co-chaired the Bush-Cheney 2004 re-election campaign in Ohio.

    "Haul Butt!"

    Congressional protocol required that Ney allow Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Cleveland) to question Blackwell. Soon Blackwell and Jones were yelling at each other in a legendary exchange that ended with Jones telling Blackwell to "haul butt" out of the chamber.

    Not quite so high profile was the ensuing testimony by Hearne, who identified himself as the head of the American Center for Voting Rights. Hearne is a long-time GOP dirty trickster, with a Rovian rap sheet dating to the 1970s. He did not explain that the ACVR had a post box in a Dallas mall, but no office, few staff, a board stacked with GOP operatives, no grassroots mailing list or much else to confirm the functioning of a real organization. Nor did Ney clarify that Hearne had served as election counsel to the Bush-Cheney campaign, and had founded ACVR the previous month, at the urging of Karl Rove.

    While the press corps rushed to report the Jones-Blackwell dust-up, Hearne laid out for Ney and the few of us left listening the essential template for the new GOP strategy for disenfranchising millions of suspected Democrats from voting in future elections. In classic Rovian terms, Hearne bemoaned a litany of "voter fraud" abuses allegedly committed by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Association for Communities Organizing for Reform Now (ACORN) and other multi-racial coalitions working to register millions of new voters across the United States.

    Among other things, Hearne told Ney the voter registration campaigns were using "crack cocaine" as an "incentive" for registering new voters. Adding the AFL-CIO and ACT-Ohio to his list of evildoers, Hearne warned that millions of "fraudulent" ballots would be cast in future elections unless something was done to curb the ability of ordinary citizens to vote without extensive identification papers.

    Hearne’s testimony drew little press. But it has led directly to the national Bush/Rove push for new laws requiring voters to show picture IDs at the polls and other methods of mass disenfranchisement - and the firing of eight US prosecutors who apparently refused to go along.

    The Cover-Up

    References to Hearne’s ACVR have now mysteriously disappeared from the Internet. But the McClatchy Newspapers have reported that Hearne’s ACVR and the Republican Lawyers Association have actively campaigned - with a war chest of at least $1.5 million - in at least nine battleground states. They stump for voter ID laws and rigid registration restrictions and other tactics aimed at radically reducing the ability of Democrat-leaning organizations to register new voters.

    The ACVR agenda embraces the administration’s illegal demand that public agencies stop registering new, mostly poor voters. And the pressure to rid our democracy of such voters has carried over to the offices of the nation’s federal prosecutors, even in the face of widespread investigations showing the numbers of people illegally trying to register and vote have been miniscule.

    Emblematic of the firings is the case of David Iglesias of New Mexico. Iglesias has testified to Congress that Albuquerque lawyer Patrick Rogers pressured him to prosecute alleged vote fraud perpetrators. When he resisted, Iglesias was fired by Gonzales.

    Rogers is listed as "secretary" of Thor Hearne’s American Center for Voting Rights, as well as a former general counsel to the New Mexico Republican Party.

    Meanwhile, the Bush Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division has reversed its mandate by fighting to narrow rather than broaden the voting rights of minorities, and to prosecute voter registration operations without just cause. An ACVR director, Cameron Quinn, is now the division’s voting counsel.

    A key target has been Project Vote, which registered 1.5 million voters in 2004 and 2006. Five days before the 2006 election, Bush’s interim US attorney in Kansas City issued indictments against four ACORN workers under contract with Project Vote. Prosecutions that close to election day have traditionally been discouraged by the Justice Department. Acorn officials had notified the federal officials when they noticed the doctored forms. But ACVR’s "job was to confuse the public about voter fraud and offer bogus solutions to the problem," said Michael Slater, the deputy director of Project Vote, they used "deception and faulty research" to help Rove’s GOP.

    The common denominator in the firings of the federal attorneys has been an unwillingness to pursue prosecutions on the basis of such research. Iglesias, for example, told Newsweek magazine he "had been repeatedly pushed by New Mexico GOP officials to prosecute workers for ACORN" who were registering voters.

    Media Missed It Again

    The media have missed what DID happen when the attorneys complied with the Bush/Rove game plan. Just four days prior to the 2004 vote, Assistant Attorney General Alex Acosta, the civil rights chief of the Bush Justice Department asked, a federal judge in Ohio to sign off on policies that would disenfranchise thousands of black voters. The move almost certainly had a significant impact on Bush’s subsequent victory in the Electoral College. Joseph Rich, a former chief of the Justice Department’s Voting Rights Section, has called the Ohio scheme "vote caging," which is illegal.

    The case arose when Republicans allegedly sent "caging" letters to thousands of registered voters in inner city districts. The letters had "do not forward" stamped on them, with a return receipt requested. When some 23,000 came back as undeliverable, GOP operatives demanded the right to get the names removed from voter rolls. Acosta argued in his letter that restricting such challenges would "undermine" the electoral process.

    But an exclusive investigation by freepress.org found that at least 25 percent of the people being removed from the voter rolls were in fact still living at their registered address. Greg Palast has reported that the GOP deliberately targeted black soldiers fighting in Iraq.

    Acosta says his letter endorsed the GOP challenges as "permissible" as long as they were not racially motivated, and that anyone whose eligibility was challenged could still get a provisional ballot.

    But due to the actions of former Ohio Secretary of State Blackwell, more than 16,000 provisional ballots from the 2004 election remain uncounted. Independent observers have testified that thousands more may have been discarded right at the polling stations. (Bush’s official margin of victory in Ohio was less than 119,000 votes.)

    Robert Kengle, who served under Acosta at the Justice Department’s Voting Rights Section, says Acosta’s unsolicited letter to the courts was "cheerleading" for the GOP. "It was doubly outrageous," he said, "because the allegation in the litigation was that these were overwhelmingly African-American voters that were on the challenge list," precisely those whose right to vote the Justice Department was charged to protect.

    Acosta was not among the attorneys fired by Bush. In fact, he is now the federal attorney in Miami.

    Eyewitness testimony from throughout the state confirms that scores of GOP activists did challenge voters in numerous inner city polling stations. Many carried Blackberries and used sophisticated lists that may have included those illegally garnered caging rosters. The challenges did lead to numerous voters being turned away, and increased the long delays suffered by inner city voters throughout the state.

    Surveys show it took blacks nearly an hour to vote on average in Ohio in 2004, while whites voted in less than 15 minutes. In the inner city of Columbus, black voters waited between three and seven hours to vote, while in the nearby suburb of Bexley it took just five minutes. The delays in Columbus alone may have cost Kerry up to 60,000 votes.

    Similar challenges were also endorsed by White House operative Tim Griffin, who has been widely accused of trying to cage mostly black voters in Florida. Rich says the scheme became public before the election, and the GOP apparently dropped the idea.

    But as he was firing the federal attorneys who refused to cage, Bush appointed Griffin to be US attorney for Arkansas. Griffin has since resigned the post under fire. But along with Ohio, the administration used similar tactics in the key swing states of Florida and Pennsylvania, as well as in Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington. Bush’s Justice Department also supported former California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson’s rejection of 20,000 voter registration forms, a move later reversed in court. And it has helped push photo ID requirements - again rejected in court - devised by Georgia to restrict black and poor voter access.

    A 35-year veteran of the Justice Department’s Voting Right Sections, Rich told the McClatchey papers that he quit over political appointees who "skewed aspects of law enforcement in ways that clearly were intended to influence the outcome of the elections." Thus, Thor Hearne’s original blueprint for disenfranchising minorities and the poor is now established administration policy, supported by Bush’s Justice Department, and backed by his firing of federal attorneys - illegal or otherwise - who refuse to go along. Whether the Democrats in Congress do anything about it, and whether the GOP successfully uses these tactics again in 2008, remain to be seen.

    New Cyber-Thuggery

    Alongside the Bush/Rove commitment to mass disenfranchisement, the key to the outcome of the 2008 election may be the rise and incomplete fall of electronic voting machines.

    Unmonitorable DRE (direct record electronic) voting machines have been center stage at every Bush-era stolen election. In Florida 2000, some 16,000 votes that "disappeared" from Al Gore’s tallies in Volusia County helped turn the tide for Bush at a key election night moment, even though they were later reinstated. In 2002, fraudulent electronic vote counts in Georgia almost certainly deprived Vietnam war hero Max Cleland of his US Senate seat in a race which all credible polls showed him winning by a substantial margin.

    The spread of DREs is at the core of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) pushed through by then-Congressman (now jailbird) Bob Ney. High-powered studies from the likes of the Government Accountability Office, the Brennan Center on Voting Rights, the Carter-Baker Commission on Voting Rights, Princeton University and US Representative John Conyers all conclude that DRE’s can be easily manipulated, with entire elections illicitly shifted by a few keystrokes.

    The GOP's HAVA means to put the nation on DREs as thoroughly as possible by 2008. But a public rebellion has slowed that plan. In Ohio, grassroots campaigners stopped Blackwell from giving Diebold an unbid $100 million contract to put virtually the entire state on DREs. Elsewhere, state and local election boards rebelled against the high cost of maintaining the machines, which often must be kept air conditioned around the clock, resulting in huge electric bills. Programming and other costs make administering elections on DREs far more expensive than doing it on paper ballots. The DREs have become infamous because of widespread testimony in Ohio that 2004 voters were pushing John Kerry’s name, only to see George Bush’s name light up, or to have their Kerry vote simply disappear moments later.

    In response to nationwide opposition, US Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ) proposed federal legislation that would have forced all electronic voting machines to be fitted with devices that would produce a paper trail. An accredited scientist, Holt also wanted to force manufacturers to make public the software that ran their machines.

    Holt’s proposed House Bill 811 divided the election protection movement, much of which saw it as an endorsement of DREs. And as the bill progressed, the GOP gutted it, killing the software transparency requirements and settling for unworkable paper trail provisions.

    The governors of Florida and Maryland have already moved to ban DREs in 2008, and to use paper ballots instead. Grassroots confrontations over how to cast and count votes will rage right up to election day.

    The need for electronic safeguards has been confirmed to the hilt by an astonishing flood of revelations from Ohio. To report Ohio’s 2004 election-night vote count, Blackwell contracted with the same GOP computer programmer who created the Bush-Cheney web site in 2000. Those GOP-programmed results were then run through servers housed in the basement of a bank in Chattanooga, Tennessee, which also housed the servers for the Republican National Committee (through which Karl Rove ran his off-the-record e-mails, now being sought by Congress).

    Supervised by Blackwell, those results showed a substantial victory for John Kerry until about 12:20 at night, when reporting inexplicably stopped. When it resumed about 90 minutes later, Ohio’s margin - and the presidency - suddenly switched to Bush.

    After the election, a citizen-based federal lawsuit (in which we are attorney and plaintiff) was filed, aimed at preserving all of Ohio’s 2004 election materials for further investigation. Those materials were protected by federal law until September 2, 2006, when Blackwell intended to destroy them. But a week prior, we won a federal court decision barring the counties from destroying any of these materials. Ohio’s new Secretary of State (SOS), Jennifer Brunner, then ordered the boards of election to deliver this evidence to her.

    But in July 2007, 56 of Ohio’s 88 county BOEs admitted to illegally destroying all or some of their records. John M. Williams, Director of Elections in Hamilton County (Cincinnati) told Brunner he was " . . . unable to transfer the unvoted precinct ballots and soiled ballots" essential to an accurate audit because they " . . . were inadvertently shredded between January 19 and 26 of ’06 in an effort to make room for the new Hart voting system."

    In Clermont County, a key Republican stronghold permeated with election irregularities, Director Mike Keeley told Brunner that "in interviewing the staff, no one could remember the disposition of said ballots," meaning the actual number of votes cast remains a mystery. In neighboring Butler County, Director Betty L. McGary informed the SOS on May 9, 2007, that they had lost the "ballot pages" thus making it impossible to confirm how votes were counted.

    Delaware County, where the last 359 votes cast in one precinct were all counted for Bush, informed Brunner that they had 29 boxes of ballots, but then delivered only 26. The Delaware BOE initially reported 1,872 provisional ballots, but the official number is now 1462, feeding suspicions the boxes were stuffed.

    Two election officials in Cleveland have thus far been convicted of felonies stemming from rigged recount procedures after 2004. Now a solid majority of Ohio’s election boards face potential federal criminal action. They have made a reliable reconstruction of the true 2004 outcome virtually impossible.

    Brunner has pledged to preside over a fair election in Ohio 2008. Like Debra Bowen, California’s new Secretary of State, Brunner is running extensive tests on the state’s electronic voting machines. Most or all of California and Ohio’s DREs could be gone by 2008, possibly to be replaced by paper ballots counted by electronic scanners.

    But even those are not immune to fraud. In 2004, Diebold technicians provided inner city precincts with malfunctioning opti-scan machines. Throughout the state, more than 90,000 ballots were never counted because of voting machine malfunctions. At a mostly Democratic precinct in Toledo, poll workers handed out pencils whose marks could not be read by the electronic counters, thus voiding the votes cast there.

    Overall, our nation’s history has been filled with stolen elections. Most have been robbed with paper ballots and stuffed ballot boxes. But under Bush/Rove, electronics are at center stage.

    High Tech Tammany

    Bush/Rove stole the 2000 and 2004 elections by intimidation, vote caging, rigged machines, rigged recounts, and much more. Bush’s firing of the eight federal attorneys only underscores the fraud perpetrated by those who weren’t fired.

    Whether Congress gets to the bottom of those firings remains to be seen. But there is little doubt the Democrats were able to retake the House and Senate in 2006 only because of the increased vigilance of a national grassroots voter protection movement.

    Though Democrats carried Ohio in the off-year elections of 2006, our research indicates that the GOP still stole as much as 12 percent of the vote, and is still intent on disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of minority, poor and young voters. In a single election in Franklin County in 2006, a magistrate found that more than 83 percent of all the precincts were miscounted on the DRE machines.

    And though DRE machines are under intense attack, their presence in 2008 will still be substantial, and will still subject the election to GOP theft.

    The lessons of 2000 and 2004 are in the terror imposed on the registration process and the error perpetrated in the vote count. Only by saying "never again" can Americans hope to see a return to actual democracy.



Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
- Health
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Nader: Ending Bush Imperial Presidency Okayed by Supine Democrats

The Imperial Presidency

by Ralph Nader

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/10/23/4758/

Mired in the disastrous Iraq quagmire, opposed by a majority of Americans, George W. Bush has reached new depths of reckless, belligerent bellowing. At a recent news conference, he volunteered that he told our allies that if they’re “interested in avoiding World War III,” Iran must be prevented from both developing a nuclear weapon or having “the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon.”

To what level of political insanity has this Washington Caesar descended? Only two countries can start World War III-Russia and the United States. Is Bush saying that if Russia, presently opposed to military action against Iran, persists with its position, Bush may risk World War III? If not, why is this law-breaking warmonger, looking for another war for American GIs to fight, while his military-age daughters bask in the celebrity lime light?

Why is he using such catastrophic language?

Surely he does not think Iran could start World War III. His own intelligence agencies say that, even assuming that the international inspectors are wrong and Iran is moving toward developing the “knowledge” of such weapons, it can’t build its first such weapon before 3 to 5 years at the earliest.

Why would a regime ruling an impoverished country risk suicide, surrounded as it is by countries armed to the nuclear teeth, such as Israel and the United States? This nation of nearly 80 million people hardly needs to be reminded that the U.S. overthrew its popular premier in 1953, installing for the next 27 years the brutal regime of the Shah.

They recall that President Reagan and his Vice President, George Herbert Walker Bush urged, funded and equipped Saddam Hussein in his invasion of Iran-a nation that has not invaded any country in over 250 years-which took around 700,000 Iranian lives.

Moreover, the undeniable historical record shows that U.S. companies received licenses from the Department of Commerce, under Reagan, to ship Saddam the raw materials necessary to make chemical and biological weapons. Saddam used such lethal chemical weapons, with the tolerance of Reagan and Rumsfeld, on Iranians to devastating effect in terms of lives lost.

Then George W. Bush labels Iran a member of the “axis of evil” along with Iraq, ignoring a serious proposal by Iran in 2003 for negotiations, and shows what his language means by invading Iraq.

The authoritarian Iranian government is frightened enough to hurl some defiant rhetoric back at Washington and widen its perimeter defense. Seymour Hersh, the topflight investigative reporter for the New Yorker magazine has written numerous articles on how the crowding of Iran, including infiltrating its interior, has become an obsession of the messianic militarist in the White House.

The Pentagon is more cautious, worrying about our already drained Army and the absence of any military strategy and readiness for many consequences that would follow Bush’s “bombs away” mentality.

Then there is the matter of the Democrats in Congress. After their costly fumble on Iraq, the opposition Party should make it very constitutionally clear, as recommended by former New York Governor, Mario Cuomo in a recent op-ed, that there can be no funded attacks on any country without a Congressional declaration of war, as explicitly required by the framers of our Constitution.

But the Democrats are too busy surrendering to other Bush demands, whether unconstitutional, above the law or just plain marinated in corporate greed. Some of this obeisance was all too clear in the Democrats questioning of Bush’s nominee for Attorney General, Michael B. Mukasey.

After the two days of hearings, no Democrat has yet announced a vote against Mukasey, even after he evaded questions on torture and argued for the inherent power of the President to act contrary to the laws of the land if he unilaterally believes he has the inherent constitutional authority to do so.

This position aligns Mukasey with the imperial views of Bush, Cheney, Ashcroft and Gonzales on the “unitary Executive.” In short, reminiscent of the divine right of Kings, the forthcoming Attorney General believes Bush can say that ‘he is the law’ regardless of Congress and the judiciary.

After two recent lead editorials demonstrating its specific exasperation over the Democrats’ kowtowing to the White House, the New York Times added a third on October 20, 2007 titled “With Democrats Like These…” The editorial recounted the ways Democrats, especially in the Senate, have caved on critical constitutional and statutory safeguards regarding the Bush-Cheney policies and practices of spying on Americans without judicial approval and accountability.

Accusing the Democrats of “the politics of fear,” the Times concluded: “It was bad enough having a one-party government when the Republicans controlled the White House and both houses of Congress. But the Democrats took over, and still the one-party system continues.”

There is more grist coming for the Times’ editorial mill. Last week, the first African-American chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, Charles Rangel (D-NY), declared that Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, Jr., fresh from Wall Street, had persuaded him, during a decade of increasing record profits, to lower the porous corporate income tax rate from 35% to 25%.

“We can live with that,” Chairman Rangel declared.

Would the working families in his District, who would be paying a higher tax rate on their modest income, agree?

Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer, and author. His most recent book is The Seventeen Traditions.



Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
- Health
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World

Cooperation & Compassion Over Marketplace And Other Delusions Of The Privileged Few

UNDERNEWS
FROM THE PROGRESSIVE REVIEW
OCT 22 2007
Edited by Sam Smith

E-MAIL: mailto:news@prorev.com
LATEST HEADLINES & INDEX: http://prorev.com


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
POCKET PARADIGMS
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

With the election of Reagan, this country began to turn its back on values that had sustained it throughout its first two centuries - values that included balancing power and wealth with concern for, cooperation with, and compassion towards others in the community we called America.

In their place came a psychotic faith in the ubiquitous virtue of the market, a faith almost creationist in its absence of objective foundation, intellectually barren when not actually dishonest, and as monomaniacal as the creed of the religious fundamentalist.

Every other aspect of existence - religion, family, morality, creativity, politics, community, tradition, ethnicity - was declared merely a byproduct of the marketplace.

For the first time in our history, the self-serving delusions of the privileged few became the standard for the whole nation, propagated in politics, on campuses and in the media. - Sam Smith

Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
- Health
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World

The Big Red Songbook

The Big Red Songbook
by Anne Feeney
The Big Red Songbook
THE BIG RED SONGBOOK
Archie Green, David Roediger, Franklin Rosemont, Salvatore Salerno (eds.)
BUY THIS BOOK


The 2007 publication of The Big Red Songbook is long overdue.  Folklorist Archie Green has been in possession of 29 editions of the legendary Little Red Songbook of the IWW since Wobbly folklorist John Neuhaus entrusted them to him in 1958.  Published between 1909 and 1956, the IWW songbooks in the Neuhaus collection vividly embody the humor, philosophy and history of the working class.  Millions of copies of these little songbooks have been sold, giving the IWW its well-deserved reputation as a "singing union."  For those of you saying "IWWWhat?" -- here's a little history.

Few chapters of American labor history are as exciting as the story of the IWW -- the Industrial Workers of the World.  The Industrial Workers of the World, also known as "the Wobblies," proclaimed in their preamble: "The working class and the employing class have nothing in common.  There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among millions of the working people and the few, who make up the employing class, have all the good things of life."  They urged all workers, regardless of race, gender, trade, or immigration status, to join in one big union to abolish "wage slavery" and create a "workers' commonwealth."  Since its founding convention in 1905, the Wobblies have fascinated and inspired generations of workers, scholars, and labor enthusiasts.

The IWW organized and welcomed workers that the craft-bound AFL shunned: unskilled, seasonal, and temporary workers, young girls in the textile mills, immigrants, African Americans, and Chinese.  The IWW was more radical than the CIO (formed 30 years later.)  From its inception, the IWW scorned collective bargaining agreements and believed solely in direct action -- shop floor actions, wildcat strikes, slowdowns, walkouts, and occasionally sabotage.  The IWW reviled the wealthy, lampooned politicians, skewered union bureaucrats, and held a special place of ridicule for "Mr. Block" -- the kind of worker who believes everything the boss tells him: that hard work will make him rich, that politicians and bosses care for the interests of workers.

From the beginning, the Wobblies were loved by many for the great humor and irreverence in their songs and artwork -- and despised (and feared) by bosses and politicians, and even by the mainstream labor movement.   The IWW had some glorious victories, most notably the Lawrence, Massachusetts "Bread and Roses" strike, and some spectacular defeats, like the Paterson, New Jersey Silk Strike.  Wobblies were staunch defenders of civil rights -- especially free speech and freedom of assembly.  They rode the rails and converged on towns like Spokane, Washington to proclaim and demand workers' rights.  There would be mass arrests and the IWW would fill the jails during their "free speech" campaigns.  IWW offices were raided and burned, their leaders were jailed, deported, or even murdered .  There are many poems and songs about Wesley Everest, Frank Little, and the most famous Wobbly martyr of all -- Joe Hill.  Some of the IWW's earliest songs are still sung today, including labor's anthem, "Solidarity Forever," written by Wobbly Ralph Chaplin.  This space does not permit telling the whole story of this colorful union, but the IWW still exists today despite decades of persecution.  Today the IWW is organizing Starbucks workers, among others.  Their website is www.iww.org.

The Big Red Songbook is 538 pages long, and contains over 250 IWW songs and many wonderful IWW poems, cartoons, and graphics.  It's clearly not intended to be read in one sitting.  Unfortunately, the songs do not have music with them.  Some are parodies, written to tunes still remembered ("My Country 'Tis of Thee," "What a Friend We Have in Jesus," "In the Sweet Bye-and-Bye," "Oh Christmas Tree").  The majority of the songs are to original melodies, or parodies of long-forgotten tunes.  There is an extensive discography at the end of the book for those who want to hear the songs.

Some of the essays, which accompany the songs, are fascinating.  The best are the four essays by IWW songwriters -- Harry McClintock, Jim Connell, Carlos Cortez, and Richard Brazier.  Brazier helped to gather the songs for the 1909 songbook, and his vivid writing links us right to the founding days of this union.  His 1968 essay on this process is fabulous, as is IWW member Carlos Cortez's essay on "Joe Hill and the Wobbly Song Tradition."

Some of the other essays were clearly written for and read at academic conferences and will be of less interest to all but the most serious scholars.  The book is also infused with random didactic political commentary supporting the decision not to include any of the IWW songbooks published after 1973.

In July, I paid a visit to the home of editor Archie Green in San Francisco to discuss this editorial decision, and the book in general.  Archie welcomed me into the modest home he and his wife Louanne bought in 1950.  He fixed me a delicious salad and could not have been more gracious and charming.  At 90 years of age, and just recovering from eye surgery, Archie Green is a marvel.  He is sharp as a tack with an encyclopedic knowledge of the labor movement and an astonishing ability to recall it.  I thoroughly enjoyed my afternoon with Archie, even though we spent most of it arguing, and I left unconvinced.

Archie Green divides labor music into three distinct categories which he describes as follows:  1) Popular Front or communist songs as exemplified by Pete Seeger; 2) Social Democratic songs as exemplified by Joe Glazer; and 3) anarcho-syndicalist songs as exemplified by Utah Phillips.  Archie Green (and presumably the other editors) decided that only anarcho-syndicalist songs belong in the Red Songbook.  Even though the IWW itself opted to include songs from these other categories (for example, Woody Guthrie's "Union Maid" and Les Rice's "Banks of Marble") in various editions of the Little Red Songbook, the editors of The Big Red Songbook have decided to protect the purity of the IWW philosophy as they see it.

The Big Red Songbook includes every song from the Neuhaus collection and songs from the next five editions of the songbook (1962-1973). The IWW's 35th edition (1984) and 36th (1995) editions did not meet the political standards of the editorial board, and the 100th anniversary songbook, printed in 2005, arrived too late for the editors' consideration.  Green himself has never carried an IWW red card.  While excluding songs that the IWW subsequently included in its songbooks, The Big Red Songbook makes room for what it calls "lost" Wobbly songs -- songs that were never included in the songbooks.  Some are interesting, some are less memorable,  some are red-baiting songs that the Wobs probably passed over with good reason.

Green didn't have much good to say about contemporary labor music, or for that matter, about contemporary labor.  Even though many IWW songs used the melody and style of popular tunes of the day, Green disdains this tactic in the 21st century.  He says, "Applauding monocultural music is like applauding George Bush."  The only labor musicians (in the English language) that Green was able to cite with favor during our conversation were Utah Phillips, Hazel Dickens, and Elaine Purkey.  Archie Green doesn't care much for "folk music" as labor music, either.  He maintains that the folk revival of the 60s was communist-inspired.  Presumably then, contemporary folksingers are at best "innocent dupes," and not heirs to the legacy of Joe Hill.  He maintains, "to the extent that Wobblies understood the folk process, they rejected it."  Not one to mince words, Green asserted about contemporary labor music -- "I don't like the people, the music or the message."  This made for a very lively afternoon of conversation.

In short, there's nothing "red" in The Big Red Songbook if you get the $24.00 version.  If you want anything RED in The Big Red Songbook, you'll have to spend $36.00 for the deluxe version with the red cover.  One could infer from The Big Red Songbook that its editors think that the IWW and labor culture ended in 1973.  They didn't even call this book Volume I.  Without being able to give Archie Green equal time to respond, I'll just say that, for my part (and I think this is true for most contemporary labor singers), I don't worry about whether a song is a popular front song, a social democratic song, or an anarcho-syndicalist song -- I ask if it's a good song, and a song that says something important and says it well.  There are many wonderful labor songs being written today . . . songs that I think Joe Hill would love.   You can find some of them at laborheritage.org/catalog.html.  You'll also find plenty of them in The Big Red Songbook.  You can buy it through ILWU Local 5, the union at Powell's Books, at www.powellsunion.com/shop-smart/shop-smart/buy-books.


Pittsburgh-based singer Anne Feeney is a member of the IWW, as well as the American Federation of Musicians.  Utah Phillips calls her "the best labor singer in North America."  Judge for yourself at annefeeney.com.  This review first appeared in the September issue of the UE News, publication of the United Electrical Workers union (UE).

Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
- Health
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World

The Big Red Songbook

The Big Red Songbook
http://www.monthlyreview.org/mrzine/feeney201007.html

by Anne Feeney
The Big Red Songbook
THE BIG RED SONGBOOK
Archie Green, David Roediger, Franklin Rosemont, Salvatore Salerno (eds.)
BUY THIS BOOK


The 2007 publication of The Big Red Songbook is long overdue.  Folklorist Archie Green has been in possession of 29 editions of the legendary Little Red Songbook of the IWW since Wobbly folklorist John Neuhaus entrusted them to him in 1958.  Published between 1909 and 1956, the IWW songbooks in the Neuhaus collection vividly embody the humor, philosophy and history of the working class.  Millions of copies of these little songbooks have been sold, giving the IWW its well-deserved reputation as a "singing union."  For those of you saying "IWWWhat?" -- here's a little history.

Few chapters of American labor history are as exciting as the story of the IWW -- the Industrial Workers of the World.  The Industrial Workers of the World, also known as "the Wobblies," proclaimed in their preamble: "The working class and the employing class have nothing in common.  There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among millions of the working people and the few, who make up the employing class, have all the good things of life."  They urged all workers, regardless of race, gender, trade, or immigration status, to join in one big union to abolish "wage slavery" and create a "workers' commonwealth."  Since its founding convention in 1905, the Wobblies have fascinated and inspired generations of workers, scholars, and labor enthusiasts.

The IWW organized and welcomed workers that the craft-bound AFL shunned: unskilled, seasonal, and temporary workers, young girls in the textile mills, immigrants, African Americans, and Chinese.  The IWW was more radical than the CIO (formed 30 years later.)  From its inception, the IWW scorned collective bargaining agreements and believed solely in direct action -- shop floor actions, wildcat strikes, slowdowns, walkouts, and occasionally sabotage.  The IWW reviled the wealthy, lampooned politicians, skewered union bureaucrats, and held a special place of ridicule for "Mr. Block" -- the kind of worker who believes everything the boss tells him: that hard work will make him rich, that politicians and bosses care for the interests of workers.

From the beginning, the Wobblies were loved by many for the great humor and irreverence in their songs and artwork -- and despised (and feared) by bosses and politicians, and even by the mainstream labor movement.   The IWW had some glorious victories, most notably the Lawrence, Massachusetts "Bread and Roses" strike, and some spectacular defeats, like the Paterson, New Jersey Silk Strike.  Wobblies were staunch defenders of civil rights -- especially free speech and freedom of assembly.  They rode the rails and converged on towns like Spokane, Washington to proclaim and demand workers' rights.  There would be mass arrests and the IWW would fill the jails during their "free speech" campaigns.  IWW offices were raided and burned, their leaders were jailed, deported, or even murdered .  There are many poems and songs about Wesley Everest, Frank Little, and the most famous Wobbly martyr of all -- Joe Hill.  Some of the IWW's earliest songs are still sung today, including labor's anthem, "Solidarity Forever," written by Wobbly Ralph Chaplin.  This space does not permit telling the whole story of this colorful union, but the IWW still exists today despite decades of persecution.  Today the IWW is organizing Starbucks workers, among others.  Their website is www.iww.org.

The Big Red Songbook is 538 pages long, and contains over 250 IWW songs and many wonderful IWW poems, cartoons, and graphics.  It's clearly not intended to be read in one sitting.  Unfortunately, the songs do not have music with them.  Some are parodies, written to tunes still remembered ("My Country 'Tis of Thee," "What a Friend We Have in Jesus," "In the Sweet Bye-and-Bye," "Oh Christmas Tree").  The majority of the songs are to original melodies, or parodies of long-forgotten tunes.  There is an extensive discography at the end of the book for those who want to hear the songs.

Some of the essays, which accompany the songs, are fascinating.  The best are the four essays by IWW songwriters -- Harry McClintock, Jim Connell, Carlos Cortez, and Richard Brazier.  Brazier helped to gather the songs for the 1909 songbook, and his vivid writing links us right to the founding days of this union.  His 1968 essay on this process is fabulous, as is IWW member Carlos Cortez's essay on "Joe Hill and the Wobbly Song Tradition."

Some of the other essays were clearly written for and read at academic conferences and will be of less interest to all but the most serious scholars.  The book is also infused with random didactic political commentary supporting the decision not to include any of the IWW songbooks published after 1973.

In July, I paid a visit to the home of editor Archie Green in San Francisco to discuss this editorial decision, and the book in general.  Archie welcomed me into the modest home he and his wife Louanne bought in 1950.  He fixed me a delicious salad and could not have been more gracious and charming.  At 90 years of age, and just recovering from eye surgery, Archie Green is a marvel.  He is sharp as a tack with an encyclopedic knowledge of the labor movement and an astonishing ability to recall it.  I thoroughly enjoyed my afternoon with Archie, even though we spent most of it arguing, and I left unconvinced.

Archie Green divides labor music into three distinct categories which he describes as follows:  1) Popular Front or communist songs as exemplified by Pete Seeger; 2) Social Democratic songs as exemplified by Joe Glazer; and 3) anarcho-syndicalist songs as exemplified by Utah Phillips.  Archie Green (and presumably the other editors) decided that only anarcho-syndicalist songs belong in the Red Songbook.  Even though the IWW itself opted to include songs from these other categories (for example, Woody Guthrie's "Union Maid" and Les Rice's "Banks of Marble") in various editions of the Little Red Songbook, the editors of The Big Red Songbook have decided to protect the purity of the IWW philosophy as they see it.

The Big Red Songbook includes every song from the Neuhaus collection and songs from the next five editions of the songbook (1962-1973). The IWW's 35th edition (1984) and 36th (1995) editions did not meet the political standards of the editorial board, and the 100th anniversary songbook, printed in 2005, arrived too late for the editors' consideration.  Green himself has never carried an IWW red card.  While excluding songs that the IWW subsequently included in its songbooks, The Big Red Songbook makes room for what it calls "lost" Wobbly songs -- songs that were never included in the songbooks.  Some are interesting, some are less memorable,  some are red-baiting songs that the Wobs probably passed over with good reason.

Green didn't have much good to say about contemporary labor music, or for that matter, about contemporary labor.  Even though many IWW songs used the melody and style of popular tunes of the day, Green disdains this tactic in the 21st century.  He says, "Applauding monocultural music is like applauding George Bush."  The only labor musicians (in the English language) that Green was able to cite with favor during our conversation were Utah Phillips, Hazel Dickens, and Elaine Purkey.  Archie Green doesn't care much for "folk music" as labor music, either.  He maintains that the folk revival of the 60s was communist-inspired.  Presumably then, contemporary folksingers are at best "innocent dupes," and not heirs to the legacy of Joe Hill.  He maintains, "to the extent that Wobblies understood the folk process, they rejected it."  Not one to mince words, Green asserted about contemporary labor music -- "I don't like the people, the music or the message."  This made for a very lively afternoon of conversation.

In short, there's nothing "red" in The Big Red Songbook if you get the $24.00 version.  If you want anything RED in The Big Red Songbook, you'll have to spend $36.00 for the deluxe version with the red cover.  One could infer from The Big Red Songbook that its editors think that the IWW and labor culture ended in 1973.  They didn't even call this book Volume I.  Without being able to give Archie Green equal time to respond, I'll just say that, for my part (and I think this is true for most contemporary labor singers), I don't worry about whether a song is a popular front song, a social democratic song, or an anarcho-syndicalist song -- I ask if it's a good song, and a song that says something important and says it well.  There are many wonderful labor songs being written today . . . songs that I think Joe Hill would love.   You can find some of them at laborheritage.org/catalog.html.  You'll also find plenty of them in The Big Red Songbook.  You can buy it through ILWU Local 5, the union at Powell's Books, at www.powellsunion.com/shop-smart/shop-smart/buy-books.


Pittsburgh-based singer Anne Feeney is a member of the IWW, as well as the American Federation of Musicians.  Utah Phillips calls her "the best labor singer in North America."  Judge for yourself at annefeeney.com.  This review first appeared in the September issue of the UE News, publication of the United Electrical Workers union (UE).
Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
- Health
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World