UNDERNEWS FROM THE PROGRESSIVE REVIEW 10 FEBRUARY 2008 Edited by Sam Smith LATEST HEADLINES & INDEX: http://prorev.com ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JUST WHEN THE CLINTON-OBAMA DEBATE WAS GETTING DULL
http://prorev.com/2008/02/just-when-clinton-obama-debate-was.htmlONE OF THE things that rarely gets discussed in campaigns is the psychological nature of the candidates. For example, America has paid deeply for its two last presidents having had severe psychological problems about which it was not considered polite to speak.
Thus, this letter from a Wisconsin reader troubled us because it offers a psychological explanation for something we had noticed about Barack Obama, but couldn't explain: a sense of an unspoken distance between his inner and outward passion, a vague disconnect between words and soul.
We still would trust Obama any day over Hillary Clinton. We are intrigued albeit not yet convinced and would welcome comment, particularly from those trained in the arts of the mind. In any case, it is as important to have some insight into such matters with a presidential candidate as they are when considering close relatives. After all, over the next eight years the former may have just a great an impact on your life.
|||| I'm bothered by a key assumption that you seem to make about Obama - that he's generally honest.
He's good at selling himself as such - an honest, nice guy. That's his brand identity. I suspect it's anything but true.
I need to say that I'm not a Hillary fan. Never have been. I kind of liked Edwards. But I'm scared to death of Obama.
I believe he has narcissistic personality disorder. This term is bandied about way too loosely. You see it being thrown at lots of politicians as a smear. Mostly by people who have no real understanding of it.
My mother has it. That - and decades of dealing with my childhood issues, etc - have given me a radar for it. It's a pretty rare condition - perhaps 2% of the population. It's enriched in certain settings (e.g. Hollywood, prisons - I used to volunteer in prisons, working with people with drug addictions, where I encountered a fair number of people with this diagnosis).
My best friend's mother also has NPD (similar life experiences drew us together). My friend recognized it in Obama a long time ago, and brought it to my attention. A therapist we know (who treats people with NPD) independently recognized it.
The NPD is much of gives Obama his magnetism. People with NPD can be amazingly charismatic. They're usually quite manipulative, but are generally perceived as "nice guys" and "upstanding citizens". They have a tendency (and desire) to "merge" with other people - partly out of a feeling of internal emptiness - which can create a kind of euphoria - a strange feeling of "union" - in the target of their attention. The language of people with NPD is often vague - so you can project whatever you want into it. The main drive is to gain admiration. A few of the other core characteristics include a deficiency of empathy (this is central, though it usually isn't obvious without protracted contact), a need for new experiences/sensations, and impatience/restlessness/impulsiveness. The lack of a solid core (i.e. life is mainly about the reflection in the mirror), combined with the deficiency in empathy, can lead to big trouble, especially when the person with NPD is in a position of powe r.
I've never met a person with NPD who is "generally honest". From what I've read about Obama's political history, I'm skeptical at best about his "honesty" (the Chicago Tribune article on his first election - knocking Alice Palmer off the ballot, David Axelrod and the Blair Hull divorce papers, Rezko, etc.).
I have no way of verifying the assertion I'm making. NPD is just something I recognize and have a deep familiarity with. I could point out a lot of characteristics but that doesn't constitute "proof".
But I see many people around me drinking the Obama Kool Aid. And troubling incidents are merely attributed to the independent actions of Obama's backers, while Obama is largely absolved of responsibility. I can think of a lot of problematic historical figures, where the initial problematic events were merely attributed to the excesses of their backers (rather than recognizing that the historical figure was driving the events). The danger of such a figure seems highest at a time when people feel disillusioned, and I think that's currently true. ||||
[Because the writer mentions his mother, we have not included his name]
Labels:
--
Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
- Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.
View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World
No comments:
Post a Comment