Friday, October 30, 2009

Did You Know? The Speed Of Information Technology - China To Be Largest English Speaking Country ...

Oct 30, 2009

   
Did You Know?
In this fascinating video about the progression of information technology, we find the research of Karl Fisch, Scott McLeod and Jeff Bronman remixed with some upbeat music -- all of which makes you go hmmmm. Top 10 in-demands job of 2010 did not exist in 2004. In the US alone, 1 out of 8 couples married last year met online. Bermuda is the #1 ranked country in Broadband Internet pentration; US is ranked 19th and Japan is 22nd. Today we Google 31 billion times every month; in 2006, that was 2.7 billion for the whole year. First commercial text message was sent in December of 1992; today, the number of text message sent and received everyday exceeds the total population of the planet. Did you know?

Watch This Video


KarmaTube is a repository of inspiring online videos coupled with small, be-the-change actions that everyone can engage in. Our weekly videos reach 28588 active subscribers.

about us | more videos






Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
-
Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Car-Free Cities: An Idea with Legs

Car-Free Cities: An Idea with Legs

Car-free neighbourhoods are no unrealistic utopia – they exist all over Europe

by Steve Melia

A quarter of households in Britain – more in the larger cities, and a majority in some inner cities – live without a car. Imagine how quality of life would improve for cyclists and everyone else if traffic were removed from areas where people could practically choose to live without cars. Does this sound unrealistic, utopian? Did you know many European cities are already doing it?

['Not anti-car, just pro-choice' ... a cyclist in Vauban, Germany. (Photograph: Sipa Press/Rex Features)]'Not anti-car, just pro-choice' ... a cyclist in Vauban, Germany. (Photograph: Sipa Press/Rex Features)
Vauban in Germany is one of the largest car-free neighbourhoods in Europe, home to more than 5,000 people. If you live in the district, you are required to confirm once a year that you do not own a car – or, if you do own one, you must buy a space in a multi-storey car park on the edge of the district. One space was initially provided for every two households, but car ownership has fallen over time, and many of these spaces are now empty.

Vehicles are allowed down the residential streets at walking pace to pick up and deliver, but not to park. In practice, vehicles are rarely seen moving here. It has been taken over by kids as young as four or five, playing, skating and unicycling without direct supervision. The adults, too, tend to socialise outdoors far more than they would on conventional streets open to traffic (behaviour that's echoed in the UK, too).

Most of the European car-free areas are smaller and "purer" than Vauban: vehicles are physically prevented from entering the streets where people live. Exceptions are made for emergency vehicles and removals vans but not for normal deliveries, which are made on foot, trolley or cycle trailer. A few peripheral parking spaces are available to buy (usually around one space for every five homes) and a few are reserved for car club vehicles. In all the examples I have studied, cycling is a vital means of transport.

Car-free areas of this kind, with anything from a couple of hundred to more than a thousand residents, exist in Amsterdam, Vienna, Cologne, Hamburg and Nuremberg, among others. There is even a small one in Edinburgh.

There is another form of car-free development, so familiar we have until recently overlooked its potential. Most pedestrianised city or neighbourhood centres in Britain are almost entirely commercial. But a few farsighted councils, such as Exeter, have brought back housing and residents, without cars or allocated parking, into city centres that would otherwise be deserted after 6pm.

Groningen, the Netherlands' capital of cycling, has the largest car-free centre in Europe: half-pedestrianised, entirely closed to through traffic, with 16,500 residents, three-quarters of whom have no car in the household. Forty percent of all journeys within the city are made by bicycle.

Carfree UK, which I coordinate, was set up to promote European-style car-free development in this country. We are not anti-car, we are pro-choice. We have recently run public meetings in London to set up a new car-free association for London, which is beginning to look at areas of the city from which traffic could be removed. We know considerable potential demand exists for traffic-free housing in London, and probably in a number of other major cities. Where else do you think might be suitable?

• Steve Melia is coordinator of Carfree UK and a researcher at the University of the West of England



Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
-
Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World


Giving Candy to Kids may Lead to Violent Crimes

The Bitter Side of a Sweet Treat: Giving Candy to Kids may Lead to Violent Crimes

Thursday, October 29, 2009 by: Elizabeth Walling, citizen journalist
See all articles by this author
Email this author

Key concepts: Candy, Sugar and Health
View on NaturalPedia: Candy, Sugar and Health

(NaturalNews) Most parents are aware that too much refined sugar isn't good for their kids. Now a new study indicates that children who are given sweets on a daily basis are more likely to end up as violent adults. The Welsh study, published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, examined data on more than 17,000 children born in April of 1970. The data was derived from the British Cohort Study, which provided detailed information about the participants at points throughout their childhood and adulthood.

When questioned at age 34, there were 35 participants who reported being convicted of a violent crime. Out of these, 69 percent reported eating candy daily as a child, while 42 participants without a history of violence reported consuming daily sweets as children. These statistics occur after accounting for factors such as gender, education, family income and parenting styles.

Researchers, however, are not entirely sure how to interpret the results of this preliminary study. Study author Simon Moore, a senior lecturer in the Violence and Society Research Group at Cardiff University in Wales, says sugar is not entirely to blame. Children who receive sugary treats every day may not learn to delay gratification and could develop poor impulse control. These traits are linked to delinquency later in life.

"We think that it is more to do with the way that sweets are given to children rather than the sweets themselves. Using sweets to quiet noisy children might just reinforce problems for later in life," adds Moore.

Experts like Melinda Johnson, a spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association, agree that the study doesn't prove sugar is the true cause behind violence in adulthood. She says the children in the study may have experienced violence at home, and suggests the possibility that children who receive candy on a daily basis may suffer from poor overall nutrition.

In fact, Simon Moore discovered the link between childhood nutrition and adult behavior before he participated in this study. "Kids with the worst problems tend to be impulsive risk takers, and these kids had terrible diets - breakfast was a Coke and a bag of chips."

We know that sugar weakens the immune system in children and also prevents some nutrients from being properly utilized, which means limiting refined sugar is a definite part of providing children with a nutritious diet. But in response to the results of this study, Moore is quoted saying, "It's not fair to blame it on the candy."

Not fair to whom? Since its doubtful candy itself will suffer hurt feelings, perhaps this means it would be unfair to the commercialized food industry if suddenly parents stopped buying sodas, fruit drinks, sugary cereals, cookies and candy to pacify their children in an effort to prevent violent behavior. The effect would likely be profound, as you could imagine.

Would it solve all violence issues? Of course not. We know that sugar is not to blame for all of our problems, but

if the use of refined sugar was greatly reduced in our society we would notice two things:
first, a broad improvement in behavior and health in both children and adults.

And secondly, commercial food companies would notice their fat wallets slimming down considerably. Neither the food or pharmaceutical industries are quite ready for an outcome such as this, so the real effects of refined sugar on children continues to be played down by experts of the industry.

Admittedly, the study in question is far from extensive and can't be considered a clear conviction against sugar. What we can infer from this study is that when parents take a more conscientious approach toward their children when it comes to food, it can have a positive effect on the lives and future of their children.

Nutrition is not the only important aspect of raising children, but good nutrition is a solid foundation which parents can build upon to help their children grow into productive, mindful adults.

For More Information:

http://www.time.com/time/health/art...

http://health.usnews.com/articles/h...

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap...


Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
-
Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World


Monday, October 26, 2009

GREEN ENERGIES 100% RENEWABLES BY 2050

GREEN ENERGIES 100% RENEWABLES BY 2050 RECOMMENDATIONS  1. An explicit national target should be set for 100 per cent green, renewable energy sources by 2050  2. Nuclear power, carbon capture and storage, and large scale biofuel or biochar plantations should be excluded   3. There should be no carbon trading to offset greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries  4. The developed nations must take responsibility for reducing their own emissions at home, while providing genuine financial and technological assistance to developing nations that have to cope with the worst effects of climate change  5. Public investment should be targeted at education, research and development of the appropriate green energy technologies present and future, including those mentioned in this report  6. Grants and subsidies should be targeted to encourage decentralised distributed small scale to micro-generation of green renewable energies, and to promote green initiatives from local communities  7. Feed-in tariffs should be introduced for all new renewable energies  8. Existing nuclear power stations should be decommissioned at the end of their designated life times. Uranium mining should cease and clean-up should begin. At the same time, weapons grade uranium should be consumed in existing reactors in accordance with nuclear disarmament  9. Major public investment should be directed towards making safe toxic and radioactive nuclear wastes by low energy nuclear transmutation   The Institute of Science in Society Science Society Sustainability http://www.i-sis.org.uk  This article can be found on the I-SIS website at http://www.i-sis.org.uk/  ======================================================== ISIS Press Release 26/10/09  ISIS/TWN Report Green Energies, 100% Renewables by 2050 By Mae-Wan Ho, Brett Cherry, Sam Burcher & Peter Saunders  “This is a road map for survival…it could be the ‘get out of jail’ card that Britain and many other countries will need to play in avoiding the drift into climate chaos.” Alan Simpson MP, Special Advisor to UK Secretary of State for Energy and Climate on Renewable Energy and Feed-in- Tariffs  “Inspiring and realistic…just what world governments need to renew their commitment to the UN Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen this December” Chee Yokeling, Director, Third World Network  Stunning artworks (see the PDF preview) http://www.i-sis.org.uk/GreenEnergiesPreview.pdf  Pre-order at discount here http://www.i-sis.org.uk/onlinestore/books.php#282  Launch Conferernce 25 November 2009  Alan Simpson MP, Michael Meacher MP, Lord David Steel & others  Further details of the report and launch conference at http://www.i-sis.org.uk/  ======================================================== This article can be found on the I-SIS website at http://www.i-sis.org.uk/  All new articles are also announced on our RSS feed http://www.i-sis.org.uk/feed.xml  If you like this original article from the Institute of Science in Society, and would like to continue receiving articles of this calibre, please consider making a donation or purchase on our website  http://www.i-sis.org.uk/ISISappeal.php  ISIS is an independent, not-for-profit organisation dedicated to providing critical public information on cutting edge science, and to promoting social accountability and ecological sustainability in science.  If you would like to be removed from our mailing list unsubscribe at http://www.i-sis.org.uk/unsubscribe 


GREEN ENERGIES 100% RENEWABLES BY 2050
Institute of Science in Society Third World Network
1
FOREWORD BY ALAN SIMPSON
Alan Simpson MP, Special Advisor to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Ed Miliband, on Renewable Energy and Feed-in-Tariffs
Let no one be in any doubt about the importance of this report. Take it seriously and this could be the ‘get out of jail’ card that Britain, and many other countries, will need to play in avoiding the drift into climate chaos.
The time for transformation is astonishingly short. There is no point in having 2050 targets without a programme that races into this transformation now. Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the International Panel on Climate Change, gives us three years in which to make dramatic switches in the whole way in which we think about energy systems.
Global leaders gathering in Copenhagen will haggle about a 2050 plan that can keep atmospheric carbon dioxide levels within a maximum of 450ppm. They hope it is not a bridge too far for the world’s politicians. The difference between the politics and the science is that the real survival threshold is around 350ppm. We are already beyond this level. Tomorrow’s agenda is not about the slowing down of carbon emissions, it is about how we row back form where we are now.
Many of the renewable energy choices set out in this report are already with us. Some require little more than a hop, skip and a jump to reach them. The trouble is that this leap has to be in a different direction from where we are currently heading. It involves some fundamental breaks from ‘big energy’, big pollution and the waste making society. Treading more lightly on the planet involves a shift into holistic economics which puts back as much - if not more - than we take out.
The report is a road map for survival. It sets out the science, the technology and the choices for a different future. All it requires is the political will... and that’s where we’re stuck. It invites changes that are as much about power as energy. Most of the choices touched on in the report work best where there is local and public ownership to ensure that the energy system supports sustainable communities rather than global shareholders.
It is not just about empowering the scientists to spell out what can be done. It is about empowering the public to become the drivers of change we can all live with. If we have the sense to act on this report may be we will.
4
FOREWORD BY CHEE YOKE LING
Chee Yoke Ling Director Third World Network
This report is an explosion of hope in a world caught in the morass of false and exorbitant solutions to the energy and climate crisis promoted by corporate interests.
The latest science alerts us that 350 ppm atmospheric CO2 is the maximum limit that we must target in order to avoid “irreversible catastrophic effects”. Developing countries with 80 percent of the world population - the vast majority struggling to rise above poverty - are already hard hit by more frequent and intense climate disasters, and any false solution foisted upon them will certainly stress them beyond the breaking point.
Fortunately, tremendous human capacity and technologies for real solutions to the crisis already exist, with more innovation emerging and further possibilities on the horizon, as Green Energies so clearly documents.
The challenge before us is to rapidly adopt renewable energies solutions across communities and nations. Green Energies is extremely timely as governments gather in Copenhagen in December 2009 to renew their commitment to fully and effectively implement the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) forged in 1992. It is our only legally binding global treaty on climate change, and nations small and large stated in the Preamble that they are “Determined to protect the climate system for present and future generations.”
Equity is a pillar of the necessary transformation towards climate stabilization and sustainable development is enshrined in the UNFCCC. It was agreed that “the largest share of historical and current global emissions of greenhouse gases has originated in developed countries, that per capita emissions in developing countries are still relatively low and that the share of global emissions originating in developing countries will grow to meet their social and development needs.”
Thus it was acknowledged that “the global nature of climate change calls for the widest possible cooperation by all countries and their participation in an effective and appropriate international response, in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities”.
Green Energies clearly states: “For the human species, it is the capacity to use natural resources responsibly and equitably, to meet the needs of all in the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”
It challenges governments to take a bold step in setting a national target for 100 percent green, renewable energy sources by 2050 that the report shows is possible with the right policies and global cooperation in place. The report is inspiring and realistic. We can do it, and cannot not do it. Climate and our survival are non-negotiable.
5
PREFACE
350 PPM THE NEW TARGET
Global warming is happening much faster than the IPPC (Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change) predicted in its latest 2007 report. For one thing, Its climate models failed to account for the rapid summer melting of the polar ice caps that’s been making headlines several years in a row.
The IPCC helped set the 450 ppm maximum of atmospheric CO2 that is supposed to limit the global temperature rise to below 2  ̊C, and prevent “dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.”
But top climate scientists Jim Hansen and colleagues, using more realistic climate models and key data from the remote history of the earth, showed that 450 ppm is beyond the danger zone, and we must even reduce atmospheric CO2 down from its 385 ppm to 350 ppm, or else face “irreversible catastrophic effects” [1]. The head of IPCC Rajendra Pachauri now agrees [2].
The good news is that we can still do it. It is not too late. All it takes is to stop burning fossil fuels to bring atmospheric CO2 back down to 350 ppm within the next decades. But we must act now, because 385 ppm is already within the danger zone, and we cannot afford to let it remain there for too long, or we push the planet past the point of no return.
That is why we need to commit ourselves to truly green energies as a matter of urgency
WHAT’S TRULY GREEN?
‘Green’ is environmentally friendly, healthy, safe, non- polluting, renewable, and sustainable.
Renewable energy, as defined by British Petroleum (BP) [3], is derived from natural processes that do not involve the consumption of exhaustible resources such as fossil fuels and uranium. But it could include industrial scale biomass, biofuels, or hydroelectric from large dams, none of which is sustainable.
‘Sustainable’ is the key to being truly green. But the word ‘sustainable’ has been hi-jacked so often to mean just the opposite that it needs to be redefined.
To be sustainable is to endure like a natural biodiverse ecosystem for hundreds if not thousands of years, thanks to a circular economy of cooperation and reciprocity that regenerates and renews the whole [3]. For the human species, it is the capacity to use natural resources responsibly and equitably, to meet the needs of all in the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. We have updated the usual Bruntland definition of sustainability [4] to incorporate the overriding lesson from nature that cooperation and reciprocity between the biodiverse inhabitants of the ecosystem are necessary for the survival of the whole; and this applies all the more so to ecosystem Earth.
Unfortunately, our policy-makers are by and large still engaged in confrontational politics, being misled by the Darwinian myth of competition and the survival of the fittest that will surely take us beyond the point of no return. History has taught us why civilisations collapse in the past when faced with ecological crises [5], simply through the failure to take the political decisions necessary for survival. Are we going to repeat history in the present global ecological crisis that has the survival of the entire human species at stake? Or will our political
leaders in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change learn to cooperate and adopt the most appropriate green energy policies for us to meet the 350 ppm target.
As Germany has demonstrated so well within the past decade, the appropriate policies can trigger a dramatic growth in new renewable energies, with industry offering a variety of distributed, decentralized options that also give people autonomy and independence from big centralised power stations. The global shift to renewable energies is happening, and many politicians and energy experts see no difficulty in achieving a 100 percent of our energy from renewable sources by 2050, which is what Germany intends to achieve [6], as the world’s first major renewable economy.
Green Energies is a follow up on Which Energy?, the first in the series of ISIS’ Sustainable World Initiative reports, and an elaboration of the theme of local food and energy systems presented in Food Futures Now, Organic, Sustainable, Fossil Fuel Free, the second report in the series.
Green Energies provides the public and policy-makers with the evidence for making the right decisions that will enable us to meet the 350 ppm target and 100 percent renewable energies by 2050. Time is running out, as are remaining resources. That’s why it is important at the outset to recognize and reject options that are not renewable or sustainable and dangerous, notably nuclear, carbon capture and storage, and biochar. Our capacity for truly sustainable and renewable energies is growing every day. It is neither necessary nor acceptable to export the burden of cutting carbon emissions to poor developing countries via carbon trading schemes. The developed nations must take responsibility for reducing their own emissions at home, while providing genuine financial and technological assistance to poor nations that have to cope with the worst effects of climate change.
Renewable energy is inexhaustible energy. Wind energy alone can supply 40 times the world’s electricity use or its total energy consumption five times over. An enormous potential also exists for solar energy, and electricity from locally installed solar panels is already as cheap as electricity from the grid. People everywhere are innovating and switching to renewables to save on fuel bills and saving communities as they are saving the planet. In 2008, for the first time, more renewable energies capacity has been added than conventional energies and the trend continues. Local small scale and micro-generation are booming in the developed countries wherever feed-in tariffs have been introduced, giving people independence and autonomy, plus the flexibilities for upgrading as technologies improve.
At the same time, appropriate science at the frontiers has opened up new possibilities for recycling waste heat as electricity, harvesting and storing sunlight by artificial photosynthesis, and solving our nuclear waste problem by low temperature transmutation after we give up nuclear energy for good. These are exciting times. All we need to save the planet is for our leaders follow the way of nature and the will and wisdom of the people.
Mae-Wan Ho and Peter Saunders October 2009


Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
-
Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World


Guess Who Is Small Enough To Fail - Most Everyone Except A Hand Full Of Fail Safe Giant Banks

Market Musings & Data Deciphering
Breakfast with Dave
http://links.ems.gluskinsheff.net/a/v.x?Token=pkfaephbbggnaohabmmefjgdpekcngccjkcecfdibophiljmfhccclhofoofpomm

...

• The financials sagged 1.6% on Friday and have done squat now for 5½ weeks.

• Just as the economists are taking their housing numbers higher, in classic “sell the fact” mode, the S&P Homebuilding index just closed down 18% from the mid-September high. That almost classifies, dare we say, as a … bear market!

• Oh yes — this is surely a sign that the credit crunch is behind us. Regulators closed seven more regional banks last Friday, bringing the tally for the year to 106. There have been more bank failures this year than in the past 15 years combined,

and the only reason why the big boys never followed suit was
because the government guaranteed all their debt
and then
allowed them to hide their losses by switching to mark-to-model accounting from mark-to-market.


Believe us when we tell you that even the most renowned experts could not tell you what is really sitting on the balance sheets of these large U.S. banks
— but there is limited downside risk because Uncle Sam has deemed them all to be ‘too big to fail’.

Those who were investors in American United Bank, well, we are sorry to have to tell you that
you were involved in an institution that was small enough to close down.


Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
-
Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World


Friday, October 23, 2009

Bood Review: The Invention Of The Jewish People - International Best Seller

"[t]he national project [creation of Israel] was ... a fully conscious one ... It was a simultaneous process of imagination, invention, and actual self-creation" (45).

the destruction by the Romans of the Second Temple in 70 AD
at that time there were already Jewish communities numbering up to four million persons in Persia, Egypt, Asia Minor and elsewhere (145). Palestine's status as the unique "ancestral homeland" of the Jews collapses together with the myth of David and Solomon's imposing kingdom.

conversion was calculated to save them from absorption into either the Roman or the Islamic empires.
engendered those Askhenazi Jews of central and eastern Europe who would later invent the myths of Zionism to justify their colonization of Palestine, a land to which they had no "ethnic" connection and where they remain the dominant elite.

the exile was a myth -- fomented, ... by the Christian church as an image of divine punishment ("The Wandering Jew")
the indigenous Jews ... converted to Islam and survive as today's disinherited Palestinians.

Today's Israel is not a democracy but a "liberal ethnocracy"
the ideal solution would be the creation of a democratic binational state.

To what extent is Jewish Israeli society willing to discard the ... image of the 'chosen people,' and to cease ... excluding the 'other' from its midst?"
+++


Book review: Shlomo Sand's "The Invention of the Jewish People"

Raymond Deane, The Electronic Intifada, 22 October 2009
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article10848.shtml

In 1967 the Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish published his poem "A Soldier Dreaming of White Lilies," only to be accused of "collaboration with the Zionist enemy" for his sympathetic depiction of an Israeli soldier's remorse of conscience. Forty years later that soldier has identified himself as the historian Shlomo Sand. He has translated his remorse into a book that has become a bestseller in Israel and France, where the award of the Prix Aujourd'hui has made the author something of a TV star.

Indeed, few recent books have aroused more interest and been more frequently reviewed in the US and Europe prior to the appearance of an English version. Translator Yael Lotan has chosen to follow the example of her French predecessors by telescoping the interrogative Hebrew title (When and How Was the Jewish People Invented?), which here becomes The Invention of the Jewish People, thus misleadingly and (deliberately?) provocatively implying that such inventiveness was unique to the Jews. However, Sand clarifies that worldwide in the 19th century "[t]he national project was ... a fully conscious one ... It was a simultaneous process of imagination, invention, and actual self-creation" (45).

Sand traces how Zionist ideology drove the project of Jewish nationalism by turning Judaism "into something hermetic, like the German Volk ..." (255). He argues that history and biology were enlisted "to bind together the frangible secular Jewish identity." Together, these engendered an "ethnonationalist historiography" which was typified by the mid-19th century German Jewish historian Heinricht Graetz and his friend Moses Hess, who "needed a good deal of racial theory to dream up the Jewish people" (256).

According to Sand, the destruction by the Romans of the Second Temple in 70 AD left the indigenous Jewish population of Judea and Samaria in place. "[T]he Romans never deported entire peoples. It did not pay to uproot the people of the land, the cultivators of produce, the taxpayers" (130). Furthermore, at that time there were already Jewish communities numbering up to four million persons in Persia, Egypt, Asia Minor and elsewhere (145). Palestine's status as the unique "ancestral homeland" of the Jews collapses together with the myth of David and Solomon's imposing kingdom.

Against the ethno-biological concept of a Jewish people -- a "race" -- whose linear descendants returned from exile to (re)found today's Israel, Sand posits a religious community proliferating throughout and beyond the Mediterranean region by means of proselytism and conversion. He offers a detailed rebuttal of the conventional wisdom whereby "Judaism was never a proselytizing religion," a view disseminated by historian Martin Goodman and others (150, note 42).

Most importantly, he concentrates attention on Khazaria, that "Strange Empire" that flourished in the Caspian region between the seventh and tenth centuries AD. By the eighth century the Khazars had adopted Hebrew as their sacred and written tongue, and "[a]t some stage between the mid-eighth and mid-ninth centuries, the[y] ... adopted Jewish monotheism" (221). Sand speculates that this conversion was calculated to save them from absorption into either the Roman or the Islamic empires. The Khazars, he contends, engendered those Askhenazi Jews of central and eastern Europe who would later invent the myths of Zionism to justify their colonization of Palestine, a land to which they had no "ethnic" connection and where they remain the dominant elite.

So if the exile was a myth -- fomented, Sand writes, by the Christian church as an image of divine punishment ("The Wandering Jew") -- what happened to the indigenous Jews? Sand's answer: they converted to Islam and survive as today's disinherited Palestinians. This seemingly radical thesis was once shared by, among others, David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister who in 1918 still believed that (in Sand's words) "the ancient Judean peasants converted to Islam ... for material reasons ... Indeed, by clinging to their soil they remained loyal to their homeland" (186).

Ultimately, the case against the Jewish state cannot be based on an unseemly tussle for genetic primacy, but on a discourse of fundamental political and human rights. Sand turns toward such a discussion in the final chapter, describing it as the raison d'etre of The Invention of the Jewish People, which he admits essentially contains nothing not already found in the work of other historians and archaeologists.

Today's Israel is not a democracy but a "liberal ethnocracy" (307) that assumes its "growing and strengthening" Arab minority "will always accept its exclusion from the political and cultural heart" (309). Ultimately we may see "an uprising in the Arab Galilee, followed by iron-fisted repression," which would constitute "a turning-point for the existence of Israel" in the region. Hence, Sand states that the ideal solution would be the creation of a democratic binational state.

Sadly, Sand hastily dismisses this "ideal project." In terms all too drearily reminiscent of Zionist apologetics he states that to "ask the Jewish Israeli people, after such a long and bloody conflict, and in view of the tragedy experienced by many of its immigrant founders in the twentieth century, to become overnight a minority in its own state may not be the smartest thing to do" (311-312). Instead, he falls back on a sequence of rhetorical questions: "[h]ow many Jews would be willing to forgo the privileges they enjoy in the Zionist state? ... will anyone dare to repeal the Law of Return ... ? To what extent is Jewish Israeli society willing to discard the ... image of the 'chosen people,' and to cease ... excluding the 'other' from its midst?"

What is behind this sorry post-Zionist anti-climax to a book that seemed to presage a heady anti-Zionist conclusion? In an interview Sand admitted that he "waited until [he] was a full professor" before publishing the book, adding that there "is a price to be paid in Israeli academia for expressing views of this sort." In providing the premises for radical conclusions without either drawing or excluding those conclusions, Sand has the best of both worlds with few if any consequences.

Ultimately, Shlomo Sand is a little like Moses, unable to cross the Jordan into the Promised Land. The journey so far, however, is instructive, and very stylishly accomplished; one hopes that the "soldier dreaming of white lilies" may eventually be emboldened to complete it.

Raymond Deane is a composer and political activist (www.raymonddeane.com).


Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
-
Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World


Thursday, October 22, 2009

Regenerative Grassroots Solution - Organic Food, Farming, & Ranching

a powerful and regenerative grassroots solution: organic food, farming, and ranching.

Millions of organic farmers, ranchers, conservationists, and backyard gardeners (supported by millions of organic consumers) are demonstrating that we can build a healthy alternative to industrial agriculture and Food Inc.

feed the world with healthy food, but also reverse global warming

transitioning from chemical, water, and energy-intensive industrial agriculture practices to organic farming and ranching on the world's 3.5 billion acres of farmland and 8.2 billion acres of pasture or rangeland

We need to drastically reduce meat overproduction

the burning question is how do we move organics in the U.S. from being the 4% alternative in the marketplace to being the norm

stop buying chemical, GMO, globally sourced and so-called "natural" food
switch to organic and more locally and regionally produced products

a political movement and change public policy
move to an ethical and scientifically grounded policy and practice that promotes health, conservation,
+++


The Organic Revolution: How We Can Stop Global Warming

by Ronnie Cummins

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/10/22-11

"Let us not talk falsely now, for the hour is getting late."

Bob Dylan, "All Along the Watchtower"

*  *   *

Beyond the gloom and doom of the climate crisis, there lies a powerful and regenerative grassroots solution: organic food, farming, and ranching. Even as politicians and the powerful fossil fuel lobby drag their heels and refuse to acknowledge that we have about ten years left of "business as usual" before we irreversibly destroy the climate and ourselves, there is a powerful, though largely unrecognized, life-force spreading its roots underground.

Millions of organic farmers, ranchers, conservationists, and backyard gardeners (supported by millions of organic consumers) are demonstrating that we can build a healthy alternative to industrial agriculture and Food Inc. Our growing organic movement is proving that we can not only feed the world with healthy food, but also reverse global warming, by capturing and sequestering billions of tons of climate-destabilizing greenhouse gases in the soil, through plant photosynthesis, composting, cover crops, rotational grazing, wetlands preservation, and reforestation.

The heretofore unpublicized "good news" on climate change, according to the Rodale Institute and other soil scientists, is that transitioning from chemical, water, and energy-intensive industrial agriculture practices to organic farming and ranching on the world's 3.5 billion acres of farmland and 8.2 billion acres of pasture or rangeland can sequester 7,000 pounds per acre of climate-destabilizing CO2 every year, while nurturing healthy soils, plants, grasses, and trees that are resistant to drought, heavy rain, pests, and disease. And of course organic farms and ranches can provide us with food that is much more nutritious than industrial farms and ranches-food filled with vitamins, anti-oxidants, and essential trace minerals, free from Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), pesticides, antibiotics, and sewage sludge.

In 2006, U.S. carbon dioxide pollution from fossil fuels (approximately 25% of the world's total) was estimated at nearly 6.5 billion tons. If a 7,000 lb/CO2/ac/year sequestration rate were achieved on all 434 million acres of cropland in the United States, nearly 1.6 billion tons of carbon dioxide would be sequestered per year, mitigating close to one quarter of the country's total fossil fuel emissions. If pastures and rangelands were similarly converted to organic practices, we would literally be well on our way to reversing global warming.

But we need an organic revolution in ranching and livestock production, as well as farming and forestry. We need to drastically reduce meat overproduction (77% of all U.S. agriculture resources are devoted to raising animals or animal feed), and over-consumption (a leading cause of obesity, heart disease and cancer) and ban methane-belching factory farms. As the Rodale Institute points out, organic livestock raising practices, including rotational grazing, manure management, methane capture for biogas production, and improved feeds and feed additives, can drastically reduce livestock-related emissions and, because of the massive acreage currently devoted to livestock production (nearly 2.5 times greater than croplands), can safely sequester approximately 60% of the total greenhouse gases that humans, animals, cars, and industry are pumping out every year.

This Organic Revolution, or "Great Sequestering," made possible by a global grassroots movement with the power to transform the marketplace and public policy, is perhaps the only short-term strategy or solution at hand that can buy us the precious time we need to radically reduce energy use and greenhouse pollution and build a green economy. Although politicians and the coal and utilities industry claim that sequestration of massive carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants is on the horizon, there is little or no scientific evidence to back this up. Sequestration of CO2 in the soils of organic farms and ranches, on the other hand, is a proven fact.

Before carbon sequestering forests and grasslands were ravaged by chemical-intensive industrial agriculture (and industrial forestry), soil organic matter generally composed 6-10% of the soil volume, three to six times the 1-3% levels typical of today's industrial agriculture soils. In other words, taxpayer subsidized, chemical-based industrial agriculture, factory farms, and unrestricted grazing (along with industrial forestry) have turned the earth's soil (which still contains three times as much carbon as the entire amount of CO2 in the atmosphere) from being a climate-stabilizing carbon sink into a massive and dangerous source of global warming. 

Given our escalating climate emergency, the burning question is how do we move organics in the U.S. from being the 4% alternative in the marketplace to being the norm, and organic acreage from being 1% of total cultivated land to the majority of farmland, pasture, and rangeland? The answer of course is that we must sound the alert, offer up our practical solutions and rapidly transform public consciousness and policy. But the Via Organica, the road to get there, will be long and arduous. The majority of Americans must not only stop buying chemical, GMO, globally sourced and so-called "natural" food, and switch to organic and more locally and regionally produced products, but we must also rise up as a political movement and change public policy. We must literally force the politicians and the corporations to put a halt to our "business as usual" destruction of the climate and public health, and instead move to an ethical and scientifically grounded policy and practice that promotes health, conservation, greenhouse gas reduction, and organic sequestration. Please join and support the Organic Consumers Association and the climate change movement http://www.350.org as we carry out this life or death campaign.

Ronnie Cummins is co-founder and director of the Organic Consumers Association.



Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
-
Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World


Bolivia's Massive Public Health Campaign - Washing Hands - Significantly Reduces Common Disease

Bolivia ... massive campaign by the country's public-health officials ... millions of other Bolivian schoolchildren have been washing their hands a lot more than usual — after recess, before meals and every time the animated dancing hands pop up in public-service announcements on TV.

increase in hand-washing ... reduce ... spread of other common diseases in Bolivia.

10% to 15% drop in the rate of incidence of acute diarrheal diseases

prevention and educational campaigns."

promoting hand-washing on billboards, at soccer games, in classrooms and on TV.

Diligent washing, especially at critical times (like after going to the bathroom and before meals, for example), helps reduce the rate of diarrheal disease by more than 40%.

led to a sharp reduction of pinkeye cases in Korea
+++



H1N1: Swine Flu's Collateral Health Benefits in Bolivia

If any good has come of the global H1N1 flu pandemic, it may have started with a child like Nayeli Quispe, 7, a second-grader from the impoverished hillsides of La Paz, Bolivia. Prompted by a massive campaign by the country's public-health officials to contain the spread of the new flu virus, Nayeli and millions of other Bolivian schoolchildren have been washing their hands a lot more than usual — after recess, before meals and every time the animated dancing hands pop up in public-service announcements on TV. "First you wet them really well, then you rub the soap all around and then you dry them with a clean towel," says Nayeli.

Public-health experts now say the increase in hand-washing across the country may have had some collateral benefits, not only in helping to reduce H1N1 infections, but also the spread of other common diseases in Bolivia. "We see a steady 10% to 15% drop in the rate of incidence of acute diarrheal diseases in all age groups, compared with last year's numbers at this time," says Dr. René Lenis, Bolivia's director of epidemiology, referring to data collected on the number of weekly cases of diarrheal disease reported in medical centers nationwide in 2008 and 2009. (See how not to get the H1N1 flu.)

Although the new statistics, and the apparent link between hand-washing practices and disease reduction, need further investigation, "this certainly raises our attention," says Lenis. Diarrheal diseases are the biggest killer of children under age 5 worldwide; in Bolivia, 30,000 children die each year from such illnesses. Swine flu, as H1N1 is still referred to there, has hit Bolivia hard as well, with more than 2,000 infections and 55 deaths in a country of 9 million, most having occurred during the southern hemisphere's winter (June through August). (Read "Child-Care Centers and Parents Brace for Flu Season.")

When the virus first appeared, say government officials, the country reacted the only way it could. "You can combat these outbreaks in two ways — medically and nonmedically," says Lenis. "Bolivia doesn't have the medical resources that other countries do, so we rely on prevention and educational campaigns."

Starting in April, sudsy cartoon hands were everywhere, promoting hand-washing on billboards, at soccer games, in classrooms and on TV. "[Nayeli] was taught at school, and then would remind us to do it at home," says Claudia Quispe, Nayeli's mom. It's not that she and her family didn't wash their hands before, explains Quispe, an indigenous Aymara shop owner, but they didn't do it as much or as thoroughly as they should have. Within her family, Quispe thinks the public-health campaign has been a success: "Normally both Nayeli and my 3-year-old son have constant stomachaches or diarrhea. But in the last few months, they just haven't had those issues," she says.

That's exactly how the program is supposed to work, says Therese Doley, a senior adviser for UNICEF's Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) project. "Kids are the key because they are great at carrying messages," Doley tells TIME. For years, WASH has been trying to educate people, particularly in developing countries, about the benefits of a simple action like washing hands with soap. Diligent washing, especially at critical times (like after going to the bathroom and before meals, for example), helps reduce the rate of diarrheal disease by more than 40%.

Often, though, the problem is not just about good habits or bad ones but about access to clean water or the ability to afford soap. In Bolivia, 25% of the country still doesn't have access to water in the home. Health officials recognize that every citizen must have a sink to wash their hands in before they can expect significant reduction in disease. But when more than half the population is already living with some sort of bacterial or parasitic stomach infection, it's crucial to encourage those who can wash their hands to do so.

Lenis and Doley are still wary of the short-term data on Bolivia's descending rates of diarrheal disease; it remains to be seen whether the trend will hold up. But the findings "make a lot of sense, because behavior change like increased hand-washing happens quicker when there is a perceived threat," says Doley. She says she has not seen similar data regarding a drop in rates of diarrheal or other diseases on an H1N1 timeline from other countries (though at least one news report suggests that increased hand-washing due to H1N1 has led to a sharp reduction of pinkeye cases in Korea). They may trickle in, however, if other countries are also looking for these correlations, says Doley.

Bolivia's challenge now is to maintain the good numbers. The last time Bolivia witnessed a plummet in diarrheal-disease rates was during the cholera outbreak of 1992 and 1993, when better personal-hygiene habits led to a reduction in the spread of infection. But as the threat of the disease died down, so too did people's standards of cleanliness. Lenis says that the Bolivian government is committed to continuing its media campaigns and that ongoing potable-water and sewage-system expansion projects will help make Bolivians healthier. Most important, however, is keeping up the education, says Lenis. "Adults forget or think [hand-washing is] not necessary anymore, but kids get into it as an activity," he says, adding that he's lobbying to make hand-washing education part of the basic public-school curriculum. It may thus be up to little Nayeli and all her friends to keep their country on track.



Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
-
Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World


The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex: A Deadly Fairy Tale

Some excerpts:
Merck’s ... Gardasil vaccine for HPV, now being widely administered to pre-teens, was found to be linked
to
... Lou Gehrig’s disease;
$1.4 
billion fine ... deceptive correspondence ... Eli Lilly gaming the system again
AstraZeneca was
fined $160 million for scamming the Medicaid system in Kentucky after being fined $215 million for ripping off
Alabama
;
Glaxo
l... failing to warn doctors and pregnant women of the dangers of its antidepressant drug Paxil related to birth defects;
Pfizer scored a record- breaking fine of $2.3 billion for illegally marketing several drugs over the years


Merck is steeped in a well-documented record of criminality.

The pharmaceutical complex has also infiltrated the majority of American medical
schools and medical research departments.

Mylan Labs settled a case for $100 million.Mylan conspired with the main manufacturer of the
active, indispensible ingredient to have an exclusive agreement
.
The FDA’s under-regulation and erroneous oversight encourages this type of corruption. 

demand legal accountability
+++

The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex: A Deadly Fairy Tale 
 
Doug Henderson and Gary Null
Progressive Radio Network, October 20, 2009
PDF Version

It has been a particularly bad month for the pharmaceutical industrial complex in its
ongoing litigations in American courts. Among the main pharmaceutical headlines, Merck’s
Gardasil vaccine for HPV
, now being widely administered to pre-teens, was found to be linked
to
amyltrophic lateral sclerosis, commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s disease; following a $1.4
billion fine in promoting one of its blockbuster drugs Zyprexa off-label, deceptive
correspondence
was uncovered by Eli Lilly gaming the system again by promoting another one
of its drugs, Cymbalta, off-label for fibromyalgia; AstraZeneca was fined $160 million for
scamming the Medicaid system
in Kentucky after being fined $215 million for ripping off
Alabama
; Glaxo lost a Pennsylvania trial for failing to warn doctors and pregnant women of the
dangers of its antidepressant drug Paxil related to birth defects
; and Pfizer scored a record-
breaking fine of $2.3 billion for illegally marketing several drugs over the years
: Bextra, Zyvox,
Geodon and Lyrica. These kinds of charges, among the many others, have become a habit for
drug makers for the past dozen years.

When we speak of the pharmaceutical industry complex, it does not refer solely to private
drug manufacturers. The complex, like a Matrix that holds captive the health of the nation in
medical slavery by its own design and manipulation, is a consortium, a spiders’ web woven with
financial attachments throughout the medical profession. In addition to the pharmaceutical and
medical device firms, this complex includes every government health agency—the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the National Institutes of
Health (NIH), and or course the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)—as well as
drug lobbying firms now employing a large number of former Congresspersons, insurance and
HMO companies, all of the leading professional medical associations such as the American
Medical Association (AMA) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA), the majority of
medical schools and their research departments who are heavily funded by drug money, many of

 
the most prestigious medical journals, and ultimately all of this filtering downward to the
physicians who diagnose our illnesses and prescribe our medications and treatments. 

America is rightly regarded as having led much of the world in many qualitative
innovations in all fields. That reputation is duly deserved. However, there is a new dynamic at
work that is causing this reputation to be challenged. We are a nation that prides itself in our
humanity, our sense of fairness, but today there is a growing concern that we are now being
monikered as a country held hostage to a national security complex, which includes the largest
military complex in the world, an obscenely expensive healthcare system and self-serving
bureaucracies and private industries that serve their own financial ends. So it is not surprising
that after spending this year $2.6 trillion on healthcare, we have such little health to show for it.
There are second world countries where people live longer and healthier lives. And we have the
worst healthcare among developed nations. So what have we received for our $2.6 trillion.

As the current healthcare debate continues to rage over in sundries—the $200 billion net
profit health insurance industry—the entire deliberation over disease prevention and treatment
has been overshadowed. And amidst this partisan and ideological anarchy, perpetuated by our
elected officials, the media, and fueled by the pharmaceutical complex, two other areas America
excels as a leader above all other developed nations is in being the premier breeding ground for
the pharmaceutical industrial complex’s greatest profits and, second, as the world’s exemplar in
medical fraud and corruption. The fairy tale of America’s health as being best served by drugs is
a creation of this complex, a lullaby that brings ill citizens repeatedly to their doctors and
hospitals for diagnosis and treatment, or simply to deny healthcare altogether to the uninsured.
The country is pacified by a blind belief that the drugs being prescribed to them have been
proven safe because our government health agencies have our physical health and well-being in
their best intentions.  This is a lie, an extraordinarily deadly lie. Iatrogenesis, medically induced
injury and death, is the number one cause of death in American medicine annually, since only a
small percentage of these deaths are actually reported. Each year more Americans die from
preventable deaths due to our medical system than all military causalities in the two world wars
combined. This is tantamount to medical genocide. One of the major causes of these deaths is the
overmedication of Americans in all ages. The constant need for profits has created an
environment that allows the pharmaceutical industrial complex to use their enormous financial

 
and political clout to literally make normal life experiences into new diseases, such as social
anxiety disorder, in order to sell its drugs. The pharmaceutical industry has been given the
authority to pathologize life, with the drugging of our children, seniors, etc. For example, the
leading cause of AIDS deaths today is a result of liver failure. This is not a condition of HIV
infection, but a direct result of the anti-HIV drug AZT. Is it little wonder then that we are being
intimidated and frightened into believing that mandatory vaccination is being touted even though
the science of efficacy and safety, even the need, for these new swine flu vaccines is patently
unproven. It is perhaps one of the largest falsehoods ever perpetuated on humanity that dwarfs
the sleaze on Wall Street. 

If any one of us committed manslaughter, we would be behind bars instead of walking a
crimson carpet into the offices of our elected officials in the Congress and Senate or past the
gates guarded by the nation’s Cerberus, Rahm Emmanuel, to lobby the White House. Yet if we
are a pharmaceutical executive, or a lobbyist representing a drug company who has collected a
litany of charges including medical fraud, criminal salesmanship, gaming the insurance
industries, repeated lying to federal officials, and manipulation of data regarding life-threatening
adverse effects of drugs that have killed so many people, we can walk away with a fine, a surge
in the stock market after a settlement, a financial bonus, and the personal satisfaction in not
having to apologize so we can continue business as usual. This is the power the pharmaceutical
industrial complex possesses and its usurped right to distain every noble principle in the
Hippocratic Oath that every physician dedicates her or himself to live by, “That  I will exercise
my art solely for the cure of my patients, and will give no drug and perform no operation for a
criminal purpose.” 

Every American who is prescribed a drug by a physician has the belief that that pill has
undergone rigorous trials to scrutinize its safety. And when there are known potential adverse
effects, we blindly assume these are known to the attending physician. However, this is a myth
perpetuated not only by drug makers, but by our own federal health agencies.  A 2003
investigation published in The Independent in the UK reported that “under pressure from the
pharmaceutical industry, the FDA routinely conceals information it considers commercially
sensitive, leaving medical specialists unable to assess the true risks [of approved drugs].” One
case involved a very popular over-the-counter drug, the painkiller ibuprofen. The investigators’

 
search uncovered concealed data showing that ibuprofen increased heart attack risks by 25
percent. Even Freedom of Information (FOI) filings to the FDA do not produce all the
information being requested. For example, a group of Swiss investigators filed an FOI to procure
trial data about the musculoskeletal pain drug Celecoxib and received back only 16 of the 27
trials conducted on it. A separate FOI concerning a similar drug, Valdecoxib, had pages and
paragraphs deleted because sections of the document were marked as “trade secrets.” An even
worse case involving a leaked report concerning internal memos and secret FDA reports
provided detailed evidence that the FDA approved 9 different antidepressants, representing a
total of 22 studies enrolling 4,250 children, while knowing full well that the risk of “suicide-
related events” was twice as high as children taking a placebo.  These are just several examples
among numerous others. 

The pharmaceutical industrial complex is perhaps the largest, most influential cartel in
the world. This becomes evident after considering the billions of dollars and other currencies
drug companies have been forced to pay for a wide variety of corruption charges. Our analysis of
724 legal settlements from a random sampling among the over one hundred thousand by
pharmaceutical corporations totally $87 billion is just a small indication about how pervasive Big
Pharma’s criminality since the vast majority of settlements are concluded outside of court and
remain confidential.

It is extremely difficult to comprehend why the United States principle federal health
agencies, particularly the FDA and National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the specific
mandate to provide oversight on all pre-approved drug applications and delegated with the task
to assure drugs are safe or at least specify clearly their known dangers, are so reprehensible and
inept. There is only one rational answer and that is the pharmaceutical industry is the FDA’s
largest client, and this relationship goes much deeper than the FDA functioning as an objective
regulator investigating pharmaceutical products before being released upon the American
population. It is not to far afield to suggest that as it stands now the US regulatory agencies are
an extension of corporate America. 

As serial offenders of product safety cover-ups for over a decade, drugs have injured and
killed millions. In the case Merck’s Vioxx,  this one drug has killed 44,000 people and injured

 
120,000 others. Only in America could you kill 44,000 and not go to jail and get a raise. Should
we assume, therefore, that the pharmaceutical complex should be trusted without challenge? We
have also been asked to believe that the manufacturers were guided by a sense of public service.
But when examining the top ten drugs sold, the facts reveal otherwise. In one example,
manufacturers marked up a drug an astounding 500,000% over its equivalent generic version. 
Six other drugs were marked up 2000%. Pharmaceutical companies make profits higher than oil
companies.     

Big Pharma’s impact is felt almost everywhere. But nowhere is it felt more than in the
legal system. In a recently concluded, short-term study, we found 724 cases involving Big
Pharma in which either the case ended in a verdict against the pharmaceutical company or the
company settled. The number of cases is staggering, as are the dollar amounts. These cases cover
practically every type of civil and criminal case. From products that kill, harm and maim, to false
claims, to not paying taxes, to patent infringements, to bribery, to publishing false scientific
journals. Yet, in spite of the tens of thousands of lawsuits won against Big Pharma, it still
conducts business as usual. 

Eli Lilly flooded state Medicaid programs with Zyprexa: its superstar, antipsychotic drug.
In 2003, worldwide sales of Zyprexa grossed $4.28 billion, amounting to almost one third of
Lilly’s total sales. In the United States, during the same year, Zyprexa grossed $2.63 billion. A
whopping 70 percent of these sales were directly related to government agencies—principally
Medicaid.  Fast-forward six years to 2009, Eli Lilly pleaded guilty for having illegally marketed
Zyprexa for an unapproved use to treat dementia, and will pay $1.42 billion to settle civil suits
and end the criminal investigation. Lilly agreed to pay $800 million to settle civil suits. It will
pay $615 million to resolve the criminal probe, and plead guilty to a misdemeanor in violation of
the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for promoting Zyprexa as a dementia treatment.

 Did Lilly also know of the possibility that Zyprexa could cause diabetes, which was also
kept concealed under the protection of the FDA? They most certainly did, which makes their
behavior all the more reprehensible. In 2002, British and Japanese regulatory agencies issued a
warning that Zyprexa may cause diabetes. In addition, even after the FDA issued a similar
warning in 2003, Lilly did not pull Zyprexa from the market. This becomes all the more

 
understandable after it is taken into consideration that Lilly is also the largest maker of diabetes
medications.

An article by Mike Adams, the Natural News editor, states that Merck employees had a
“hit list” of doctors they sought to “neutralize.” This allegation was confirmed when documents
that had been secret were revealed during a Vioxx court case. The Australian revealed that the
documents surfaced in the Federal Court in Melbourne and exposed the criminal intent
of Merck employees who admitted they were going to “stop funding to institutions” and
“interfere with academic appointments.”   One Merck employee testified (about the doctors on
the hit list), “We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live.” Merck
threatened or intimidated at least eight clinical investigators, testimony in court revealed. There
are other, similar stories in which Merck deals with dissent by attempting to destroy the lives
and careers of academics who don’t  review their drugs favorably.  

Merck is steeped in a well-documented record of criminality. Such actions include, but
are not limited to, intentionally hiding the liver-damaging effects of its cholesterol drug,
intentionally withholding the release of clinical data that revealed the failures of another
cholesterol drug; it has dumped vaccine waste and manufacturing chemicals into water supplies;
it opened up offshore banking accounts to avoid paying billions of dollars in U.S. taxes, and it
was caught in a huge scheme of scientific fraud when it was discovered that the company used
in-house writers to secretly write so-called “independent” studies that were published in peer-
reviewed medical journals.

Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which the U.S. Department of Justice and the
SEC enforce, it is illegal to bribe a foreign government official in order to obtain or retain
business. Apparently, Bristol-Myers and Schering Plough were unaware of this law. According
to the Associated Press, both drug makers were engaged in influencing government officials in
Germany and Poland respectively.  

 Earlier this year, an article in the Boston Business Journal reported that a former drug
company sales executive pleaded guilty in Boston federal court to telling the roughly 100
representatives she supervised that they should promote a pain drug for uses she knew had been
rejected by the FDA. Bextra was the drug she pleaded guilty to inappropriately selling. Pfizer has

 
since pulled it from the market. According to a press release from U.S. Attorney Michael
Sullivan's office, “Holloway was aware of the FDA's safety concerns, but...she nonetheless had
her sales staff of approximately 100 employees sells Bextra for precisely the uses that the FDA
refused to approve.” 

 The pharmaceutical complex has also infiltrated the majority of American medical
schools and medical research departments.
A recent survey in the Journal of the American
Medical Association discovered that 60% of academic department chairs have personal ties to
industry (as consultants, board members, or paid speakers), while 66% of the academic
departments had institutional ties to industry. Researchers who receive funding from drug and
medical-device manufacturers are up to 3.5 times as likely to state their study drug or medical
device works than are researchers without such funding. 

In America, one can hardly turn on the television or pick up a newspaper without reading
about the hot button issue of health care reform. Why such emotion?  Why are, seemingly,
rational people so intransigent and unwilling to budge from their positions? Could lobbyists have
anything to do with this? According to OpenSecrets.org, there are 3093 lobbyists in the health
field and Big Pharma now spends approximately $1.2 million daily to persuade Congress to act
according to their script. An investigation conducted by Medical Verdicts & Law Weekly found
that 30 key lawmakers are involved in health legislation totaling $11 million in health
investments.  Three of every four major health firms have at least one lobbyist who worked for a
congressman. Startlingly, nine lobbyists employed by Big Pharma are former congressional
staffers who are still well-connected to Capitol Hill. The conflicts of interest are everywhere.
Judd Gregg (R-NH), the Obama nominee for Commerce Secretary, who withdrew because of
opposition to the Administration's agenda, is a senior member of the Health Committee. He
revealed that he has $254,000-$560,000 in health stocks." 

In 2000, Mylan Labs settled a case for $100 million. What the numbers don’t tell you is
the story behind the numbers. In 1998, Mylan raised the wholesale price of clorazepate, a generic
tranquilizer, to $377.00 (for 500 tablets) from $11.36 in one year. This represents a 3000%
increase on a generic drug. 

 
It was subsequently revealed that Mylan conspired with the main manufacturer of the
active, indispensible ingredient to have an exclusive agreement
. The agreement prevented any
other manufacturers from producing the drug, for without the active ingredient, the drug could
not be made. Mylan’s deception was uncovered and it had to pay $100 million to settle an FTC
antitrust case. But Mylan represents only an infinitesimal percentage of such examples. In all
likelihood, the vast majority of similar cases remain undetected.  The FDA’s under-regulation
and erroneous oversight encourages this type of corruption. 


Another case included in our study states, “TAP [Taketa-Abbott Pharmaceutical]
Pharmaceutical Products Inc. -- $875,000,000 under the False Claims Act.” TAP agreed to pay
$875 million to resolve criminal charges and civil liabilities in connection with its fraudulent
drug pricing and marketing conduct regarding the drug Lupron, according to a press release from
the Department of Justice. Lupron is used by male cancer patients to suppress the production of
testosterone. Another drug worked as well, so to make Lupron the drug of choice for this
condition, TAP played dirty by giving kickbacks to physicians prescribing the drug, thus
ensuring its ridiculously high price would be maintained. Even though criminal indictments were
filed against TAP Pharmaceutical officials, Lupron’s price remains overly inflated. 

Ever wonder why Big Pharma would engage in all manner of illegal activity? In light of
the steady stream of articles detailing how the elderly are oftentimes forced to choose between
purchasing their medication and buying food, a good place to begin is to examine what it costs to
make a drug and what Big Pharma sells it for. Life Extension magazine conducted an original
investigative report in which it compared the actual price of a popular drug and how much the
generic version of its active ingredients costs. Examine these figures:

WHAT DRUGS REALLY COST
BRAND NAME CONSUMER
PRICE 
(For 100
tabs/caps)
COST OF
GENERIC
ACTIVE
INGREDIENT
(For 100
tabs/caps) 
PERCENT MARKUP

 
 
Celebrex 100 mg $130.27 $0.60 21,712%
Claritin 10 mg $215.17 $0.71 30,306%
Keflex 250 mg $157.39 $1.88 8,372%
Lipitor 20 mg $272.37 $5.80 4,696%
Norvasc 10 mg $188.29 $0.14 134,493%
Paxil 20 mg $220.27 $7.60 2,898%
Prevacid 30 mg $344.77 $1.01 34,136%
Prilosec 20 mg $360.97 $0.52 69,417%
Prozac 20 mg $247.47 $0.11 224,973%
Tenormin 50 mg $104.47 $0.13 80,362%
Vasotec 10 mg $102.37 $0.20 51,185%
Xanax 1mg $136.79 $0.024 569,958%
Zestril 20 mg $89.89 $3.20 2,809%
Zithromax 600mg $1,482.19 $18.78 7,892%
Zocor 40mg $350.27 $8.63 4,059%
Zoloft 50mg $206.87 $1.75 11,821%   
 

 
In order to understand how we can spend 2.6 trillion this year on healthcare, but not
reduce the incidence of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, obesity, mental conditions, arthritis, etc.,
we must realize this is a game. With each piece of the puzzle, feeding into a single picture of a
massively corrupt, unethical, and frequently illegal system controlled by relatively few
corporations within the pharmaceutical complex and the health insurance industry, are the ring
leaders. They in turn influence thousands of lobbyists, paid-off scientists and academicians, and
policymakers, especially those who rule on important health oversight committees. Health
officials and legislators in turn solicit expert witnesses, preselected by the cartels, to position
their drug agendas in the most favorable manner. The pharmaceutical cartel also has direct
connections with its supporting scientific advisory boards and key foundations. These
foundations, supported by policy think tanks who supply the so-called independent experts, then
lobby the upper echelon within the FDA, NIH, CDC, NIMH, HHS. Ideally they hire former
health commissioners and legislators previously players in the game to assist those same federal
agencies to see their drugs guided through the regulatory process. Public relations and
advertizing firms are contracted to give the public impression that these drugs are effective and
safe for the sole reason they have received official licensing. In addition, the cartel creates front
organizations with consumer-friendly titles whose representatives appear at national conferences
and seminars beholden to special drug interests. Finally, the drug corporations set money aside to
be paid out in settlements. With the exception of class action suits, the majority of cases for
injury and death are accompanied by confidentiality clauses to prevent public disclosure of data
the companies wish to remain secret. 

This is how the medical system is rigged and it is why we can watch 60 Minutes or read
the New York Times serving as pharmaceutical shills to encourage vaccination, yet refusing to
air or print the dissenting voices who have the scientific evidence to show it is a massive fraud.
Therefore, the public is misled every step of the way.  Victims of injury, such as the tens of
thousands of children, now at 1 in 91 children, with autism spectrum disorder, are forced to fend
for themselves. Parents know far better than the FDA and CDC, when their perfectly normal
child after a vaccination or a series of vaccines shortly thereafter is lost, withdrawn into the dark
corners of autism. And yet the pediatrician and psychologist will say the child must have had a
genetic defect. The CDC, FDA and NIH, with an orchestrated voice, say it is not the vaccine.
Everyone within the pharmaceutical industrial complex denies the truth.  Only now, during the
10 
 
11 
 
healthcare debate, are we seeing clearly the rampant politics of the pharmaceutical and insurance
industries. The veils are finally being removed. If it were not for the healthcare debacle, we
might still not know how the game is rigged and why our politicians and health officials will not
tolerate any real reform and accountability at any level. 

If we want to clean up American medicine, the corporate shield must be removed and
politicians, health officials and pharmaceutical executives must be held accountable. If they are
threatened with jail time for manslaughter by pushing dangerous drugs, then we will see less life-
threatening drugs go to market. 

We are in a perfect storm without a life raft. We much take back our freedoms of choice
and demand legal accountability or nothing will change. 

Doug Henderson, JD is a legal mediator specializing in civil rights and Director of Gary
Null and Associates in New York City. Dr. Gary Null is the host of the nation’s longest
running public radio program on nutrition and natural health and a multi-award-winning
director of progressive documentary films, including Vaccine Nation and Autism:
Made in the USA. Dr. Null is also the plaintiff on a law suit against the FDA to prevent
the launch of the swine flu vaccine until safety studies have been thoroughly conducted.

Labels:
--

Subscribe to emails from :
- Better World News: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/bwn_at7l.us
- Learning News - children learning, how mind works: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/learn_at7l.us
-
Health News - better ways of healthy living: http://at7l.us/mailman/listinfo/health_at7l.us
- Good Morning World - Robert & Barbara Muller's daily idea-dream for a better world: http://www.goodmorningworld.org/emaillist/#subscribe
or send a request a subscription to any of the three lists here.

View these blogs:
- Better World News
- Learning News
- Health News
- Good Morning World